显著性差异

統計學名詞
(重定向自显著性检验

统计学假设检验[1][2]显著性差异(或统计学意义,英语:statistical significance)是对数据差异性的评价,当某次实验的结果在零假设下不大可能发生时,就认为该结果具有显著性差异。更准确而言,譬如某项研究设定了一个数值α(显著性水平),表示零假设本来正确但却被拒绝的出错概率[3]并非零假设为真的概率、备择假设为假的概率、实验再现失败率[4]),然后用p值表示零假设条件为真时得到某结果或更极端结果的概率[5]。当pα时,就可以认为结果具有统计学意义,或数据之间具有了显著性差异。[6][7][8][9][10][11][12]显著性水平应当在开始数据收集前就设定,通常习惯设定为5%[13]或更低,因研究的具体学科领域而异。[14]

双尾检验英语one- and two-tailed tests中,显著性水平α = 0.05下的拒绝域分处在抽样分布两端的尾部,共占曲线下方面积的5%。

在任何涉及到从总体抽取样本实验观察性研究中,观察到的结果都有可能只不过是由抽样误差英语sampling error产生的。[15][16]但是,如果一个观察结果的p值小于(或等于)显著性水平α,研究者就可以得出“该结果能反映总体的特征”的结论[1],并拒绝零假设[17]

显著性差异的原因可能是:

  • 参与比对的数据是来自不同实验对象,如比-西一般能力测验中,大学学历被试组的成绩与小学学历被试组之间,会存在显著性差异;
  • 也可能是因为实验处理对实验对象造成了改变,因而前测、后测的数据会有显著性差异。例如,记忆术研究发现,被试者学习某记忆法前的成绩,和学习记忆法后的记忆成绩会有显著性差异,则这一差异很可能来自于这种记忆法对被试记忆能力的改变。

历史

编辑

显著性差异的提出可追溯到18世纪,约翰·阿巴思诺特英语John Arbuthnot皮埃尔-西蒙·拉普拉斯作出了男女出生概率均等的零假设,然后计算了人类出生时性别比p值[18][19][20][21][22][23][24]

1925年,罗纳德·费希尔在《研究工作者的统计方法英语Statistical Methods for Research Workers》一书中提出了统计假设检验的思想,称之为“显著性检验”(tests of significance)。[25][26][27]费希尔建议将1/20(=0.05)的概率作为拒绝零假设的一个截断值。[28]在1933年的一篇论文中,耶日·内曼埃贡·皮尔逊把这个截断值称为“显著性水平”,并赋予它符号α。他们建议,α值应当在收集任何数据收集之前提前设定。[28][29]

费希尔最初将显著性水平定为0.05,但他并不打算将这一截断值定死。在他1956年出版的《统计方法与科学推断》一书中,他建议根据具体情况确定显著性水平。[28]

相关概念

编辑

显著性水平αp值的阈值,当pα时就拒绝零假设(即使零假设仍有可能是正确的)。这意味着α也是在零假设正确的情况下错误地将其否定的概率[3],称为伪阳性第一类错误、弃真错误、α错误。

而有些研究者偏好使用置信水平γ = 1 − α。它是零假设成立时不拒绝零假设的概率。[30][31]置信水平和置信区间是Neyman于1937年提出的。[32]

显著性水平

编辑

显著性水平significance level,符号:α)常用于假设检验中检验假设和实验结果是否一致,它代表在零假设(记作 )为真时,错误地拒绝 的概率,即发生第一类错误(弃真错误、α错误)的概率。

比如,我们从两个总体中分别抽取了两组样本数据A和B,这两组数据在显著性水平α = 0.05下具备显著性差异。这是说,两组数据所代表的总体具备显著性差异的可能性为95%;但它们代表的总体仍有5%的可能性是没有显著性差异的,这5%是由于抽样误差英语sampling error造成的。也可表述为:

  • 如果拒绝“两组数据一致(二者不具备显著性差异)”的零假设(接受“两组数据不一致”的备择假设),此时有5%的可能性犯第一类错误
  • 如果A=两组数据不具备显著差异;B=实际数据具有显著差异,则P(A|B) = 0.05,即统计100次,预期是B情况,但可能出现5次的A情况。

假设检验所测得之数据之间具有显著性差异,实验的零假设就可被推翻,也就是拒绝 ,接受备择假设(alternative hypothesis,记作  );反之,若数据之间不具备显著性差异,则拒绝备择假设,不拒绝零假设。通常情况下,实验结果需要证明达到显著性水平α = 0.050.01,才可以说数据之间具备了显著性差异,否则就如上所述,容易作出错误的推论。在作结论时,应确实描述方向性(例如显著大于或显著小于)。

数学表述为:引入p值作为检验样本(test statistic)观察值的最低显著性水平。在α = 0.01α = 0.05的条件下,若零假设成立的概率p)小于α,则表示零假设成立的情况下得到这种观测结果的概率,比1%或5%还低,在该显著性水平下,我们可拒绝该零假设。

  • P(X=x)<α=0.05为“显著(significant)”,统计分析软件SPSS中以*标记;
  • P(X=x)<α=0.01为“极显著(extremely significant)”,通常以**标记。

局限性

编辑

研究人员常常只关注他们的结果是否具有统计学意义,但其报告的结果可能并没有实质性[33],或者研究结果无法重现英语Reproducibility[34][35]。统计学意义与实际意义之间也不能等同,有统计学意义的研究未必就有实际意义。[36][37]

效应值

编辑

效应值是衡量一项研究的实际意义。[36]统计上显著的结果可能效应量很低。为了衡量结果的研究意义,研究人员最好同时给出效应值和p值。效应量量化了效应的强度,例如以标准差为单位的两个平均值之间的距离(Cohen's d)、两个变量之间的相关系数其平方,以及其他度量。[38]

再现性

编辑

统计上显著的结果未必能够轻易重现英语Reproducibility[35]特别是一些有显著性差异的结果实际上是假阳性。重现结果每失败一次,都意味着研究结果实际上为假阳性的可能性增加。[39]

参见

编辑

参考文献

编辑
  1. ^ 1.0 1.1 Sirkin, R. Mark. Two-sample t tests. Statistics for the Social Sciences 3rd. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. 2005: 271–316. ISBN 978-1-412-90546-6. 
  2. ^ Borror, Connie M. Statistical decision making. The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook 3rd. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press. 2009: 418–472. ISBN 978-0-873-89745-7. 
  3. ^ 3.0 3.1 Dalgaard, Peter. Power and the computation of sample size. Introductory Statistics with R. Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer. 2008: 155–56. ISBN 978-0-387-79053-4. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-79054-1_9. 
  4. ^ 平克, 史蒂芬. 理性. : 282. 
  5. ^ Statistical Hypothesis Testing. www.dartmouth.edu. [2019-11-11]. (原始内容存档于2020-08-02). 
  6. ^ Johnson, Valen E. Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. October 9, 2013, 110 (48): 19313–19317. Bibcode:2013PNAS..11019313J. PMC 3845140 . PMID 24218581. doi:10.1073/pnas.1313476110 . 
  7. ^ Redmond, Carol; Colton, Theodore. Clinical significance versus statistical significance. Biostatistics in Clinical Trials. Wiley Reference Series in Biostatistics 3rd. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2001: 35–36. ISBN 978-0-471-82211-0. 
  8. ^ Cumming, Geoff. Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. New York, USA: Routledge. 2012: 27–28. 
  9. ^ Krzywinski, Martin; Altman, Naomi. Points of significance: Significance, P values and t-tests. Nature Methods. 30 October 2013, 10 (11): 1041–1042. PMID 24344377. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2698 . 
  10. ^ Sham, Pak C.; Purcell, Shaun M. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nature Reviews Genetics. 17 April 2014, 15 (5): 335–346. PMID 24739678. S2CID 10961123. doi:10.1038/nrg3706. 
  11. ^ Altman, Douglas G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research . New York, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 1999: 167. ISBN 978-0412276309. 
  12. ^ Devore, Jay L. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 8th. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. 2011: 300–344. ISBN 978-0-538-73352-6. 
  13. ^ Craparo, Robert M. Significance level. Salkind, Neil J. (编). Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications: 889–891. 2007. ISBN 978-1-412-91611-0. 
  14. ^ Sproull, Natalie L. Hypothesis testing. Handbook of Research Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Students in the Social Science 2nd. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, Inc. 2002: 49–64. ISBN 978-0-810-84486-5. 
  15. ^ Babbie, Earl R. The logic of sampling. The Practice of Social Research 13th. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. 2013: 185–226. ISBN 978-1-133-04979-1. 
  16. ^ Faherty, Vincent. Probability and statistical significance. Compassionate Statistics: Applied Quantitative Analysis for Social Services (With exercises and instructions in SPSS) 1st. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. 2008: 127–138. ISBN 978-1-412-93982-9. 
  17. ^ McKillup, Steve. Probability helps you make a decision about your results . Statistics Explained: An Introductory Guide for Life Scientists 1st. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 2006: 44–56. ISBN 978-0-521-54316-3. 
  18. ^ Brian, Éric; Jaisson, Marie. Physico-Theology and Mathematics (1710–1794). The Descent of Human Sex Ratio at Birth. Springer Science & Business Media. 2007: 1–25. ISBN 978-1-4020-6036-6. 
  19. ^ John Arbuthnot. An argument for Divine Providence, taken from the constant regularity observed in the births of both sexes (PDF). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1710, 27 (325–336): 186–190 [2022-06-19]. doi:10.1098/rstl.1710.0011 . (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2021-06-03). 
  20. ^ Conover, W.J., Chapter 3.4: The Sign Test, Practical Nonparametric Statistics Third, Wiley: 157–176, 1999, ISBN 978-0-471-16068-7 
  21. ^ Sprent, P., Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods Second, Chapman & Hall, 1989, ISBN 978-0-412-44980-2 
  22. ^ Stigler, Stephen M. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900. Harvard University Press. 1986: 225–226. ISBN 978-0-67440341-3. 
  23. ^ Bellhouse, P., John Arbuthnot, in Statisticians of the Centuries by C.C. Heyde and E. Seneta, Springer: 39–42, 2001, ISBN 978-0-387-95329-8 
  24. ^ Hald, Anders, Chapter 4. Chance or Design: Tests of Significance, A History of Mathematical Statistics from 1750 to 1930, Wiley: 65, 1998 
  25. ^ Cumming, Geoff. From null hypothesis significance to testing effect sizes. Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. Multivariate Applications Series. East Sussex, United Kingdom: Routledge. 2011: 21–52. ISBN 978-0-415-87968-2. 
  26. ^ Fisher, Ronald A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd. 1925: 43. ISBN 978-0-050-02170-5. 
  27. ^ Poletiek, Fenna H. Formal theories of testing. Hypothesis-testing Behaviour. Essays in Cognitive Psychology 1st. East Sussex, United Kingdom: Psychology Press. 2001: 29–48. ISBN 978-1-841-69159-6. 
  28. ^ 28.0 28.1 28.2 Quinn, Geoffrey R.; Keough, Michael J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists 1st. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2002: 46–69. ISBN 978-0-521-00976-8. 
  29. ^ Neyman, J.; Pearson, E.S. The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1933, 29 (4): 492–510. Bibcode:1933PCPS...29..492N. doi:10.1017/S030500410001152X. 
  30. ^ "Conclusions about statistical significance are possible with the help of the confidence interval. If the confidence interval does not include the value of zero effect, it can be assumed that there is a statistically significant result." Prel, Jean-Baptist du; Hommel, Gerhard; Röhrig, Bernd; Blettner, Maria. Confidence Interval or P-Value?. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Online. 2009, 106 (19): 335–9. PMC 2689604 . PMID 19547734. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0335. 
  31. ^ StatNews #73: Overlapping Confidence Intervals and Statistical Significance (PDF). [2022-06-19]. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2020-06-21). 
  32. ^ Neyman, J. Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A英语Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 1937, 236 (767): 333–380. Bibcode:1937RSPTA.236..333N. JSTOR 91337. doi:10.1098/rsta.1937.0005 . 
  33. ^ Carver, Ronald P. The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing. Harvard Educational Review. 1978, 48 (3): 378–399. S2CID 16355113. doi:10.17763/haer.48.3.t490261645281841. 
  34. ^ Ioannidis, John P. A. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine. 2005, 2 (8): e124. PMC 1182327 . PMID 16060722. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. 
  35. ^ 35.0 35.1 Amrhein, Valentin; Korner-Nievergelt, Fränzi; Roth, Tobias. The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research. PeerJ. 2017, 5: e3544. PMC 5502092 . PMID 28698825. doi:10.7717/peerj.3544. 
  36. ^ 36.0 36.1 Hojat, Mohammadreza; Xu, Gang. A Visitor's Guide to Effect Sizes. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2004, 9 (3): 241–9. PMID 15316274. S2CID 8045624. doi:10.1023/B:AHSE.0000038173.00909.f6. 
  37. ^ Hooper, Peter. What is P-value? (PDF). University of Alberta, Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences. [November 10, 2019]. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2020-03-31). 
  38. ^ Pedhazur, Elazar J.; Schmelkin, Liora P. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach Student. New York, NY: Psychology Press. 1991: 180–210. ISBN 978-0-805-81063-9. 
  39. ^ Stahel, Werner. Statistical Issue in Reproducibility. Principles, Problems, Practices, and Prospects Reproducibility: Principles, Problems, Practices, and Prospects. 2016: 87–114. ISBN 9781118864975. doi:10.1002/9781118865064.ch5.