用户:月都/Edit3816

“封锁应具有阻吓作用”的意思：封锁时应该具有让人害怕后果来阻止扰乱的效果和用途。

“如果害怕后果的话，他就不敢继续扰乱维基百科。”我认为有点理想化，每个人的特质存在差异，有些人可能会接受，有些人可能会抗拒，非但做不到您想要的效果，反而导致冲突升级。

如果水晶球显示扰乱风险较低的话，封锁就没有必要继续下去，因为它是限制编辑的措施，窒碍编者于未来建设维基百科。

如果为了制造寒蝉效应而封锁的话，对象就会变成防止其他破坏或扰乱维基百科的人。

如果为了追求编辑权限而来到维基百科的话，将编辑权限当作奖赏或惩罚，这套机制使他们变得功利，所以最好就发自内心热爱这部百科全书、明白运作模式的深层次背景。

故此我认为吓阻或威慑就如一则讯息，告诉他们改变的重要性和行为的不可接受性，因为封锁本质仅可用于阻止维基百科受到破坏或扰乱。

翻译英语维基百科封锁方针的用途和目标章节。

Purpose and goals
用途和目的

---

Blocks serve to protect the project from harm, and reduce likely future problems. Blocks may escalate in duration if problems recur. They are meted out not as retribution but to protect the project and other users from disruption and inappropriate conduct, and to deter any future possible repetitions of inappropriate conduct. Blocking is one of the most powerful tools that are entrusted to administrators, who should be familiar with the circumstances prior to intervening and are required to be able to justify any block that they issue.

封锁用于保护维基百科免受损害，以及减少未来很可能出现的问题。如果问题再次出现，可能延长封锁期限。这些措施不是给予相应的惩罚，而是保护维基百科和其他用户免受扰乱和不当行为的影响，以及 deter 任何未来可能重复的不当行为。封锁是委托给管理员的最强大工具之一，管理员应该在介入之前熟悉事件的情境，以及需要能够证明他们发出任何封锁的合理性。

In general, once a matter has become "cold" and the risk of present disruption has clearly ended, reopening it by blocking retrospectively is usually not appropriate. In this situation, if an ongoing or serious concern persists, several dispute resolution processes exist to allow discussion and possible sanction of a user.

一般来说，一旦事情变得冷淡以及当前的扰乱风险已经明显结束，透过重新打开它来作出追溯式封锁是通常不合适的。在这种情况下，如果持续存在一个正在进行或让人严重担忧的问题，则存在几种争议解决流程以允许讨论并可能制裁一个用户。

Blocks can be appealed (see § Unblocking). Requests to be unblocked are also decided in light of prevention and deterrence. A user may be unblocked earlier if the user agrees to desist and appears to have learned from the matter, or if the situation was temporary and has now ended. Likewise, a user who has previously returned to inappropriate conduct after other unblocks may find their unblock request declined for deterrence reasons, to emphasize the importance of change and unacceptability of the conduct.

可以对封锁提出申诉（参见 § 解除封锁）。解除封锁的请求取决于预防和 deterrence 的考量。如果用户同意停止并似乎从事件中学习，或者情况是暂时并现已结束，则可以提前解除对用户的封锁。同样，先前在其他解封后又恢复不当行为的用户可能会发现他们的解封请求因 deterrence 而被拒绝，以强调改变的重要性和行为的不可接受性。

Blocks should not be punitive

Blocks should not be used:

1. to retaliate;
2. to disparage;
3. to punish; or
4. if there is no current conduct issue of concern.

封锁不应该是惩罚性

封锁不应该用于：

1. 报复；
2. 贬低；
3. 惩罚; 或者
4. 如果当前没有令人担忧的行为问题。

Blocks should be preventative

Blocks should be used to:

1. prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia;
2. deter the continuation of present, disruptive behavior; and
3. encourage a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms.

Deterrence is based upon the likelihood of repetition. For example, though it might have been justifiable to block an editor a short time ago, such a block may no longer be justifiable right now, particularly if the actions have since ceased or the conduct issues have been resolved.

封锁应该是预防性

封锁应该用于：

1. 预防对维基百科造成迫在眉睫或持续的损害和扰乱；
2. deter 当前持续的扰乱性行为；
3. 鼓励采用在社区规范内更有效率、更友善的编辑风格。

Deterrence 是基于重复的可能性。举个例子，虽然不久前封锁编辑者可能是合理的，但现在这样的封锁可能不再合理，特别是已停止行动或已解决行为问题。