语言模块
语言模块，又称为“语言官能 ”，是人脑或认知系统中的一种假设结构，含有与生俱来的语言能力，最初由诺姆·乔姆斯基提出。目前关于大脑模块化的研究正在认知科学和神经科学领域进行，不过目前的观点相较于乔姆斯基和杰瑞·福多在1980年代所提出的观点弱上许多。在今日术语中，模块化指的是专门化处理：语言处理在大脑中是专门化的，这意指语言处理是局部发生在不同的区域，不同于像是视觉输入这种其它类型的资讯处理。目前的观点认为，语言既非发生在分隔的区域，也不是基于像乔治·莱考夫所提出的那种通用的加工原则，而是在某种程度上模块化的，被认为是认知功能中的一个特定的认知技巧或认知区域。[1][2][3]
模块的含义
编辑人脑中“语言专用模块”的概念，起源于乔姆斯基的普遍文法 （UG）理论。由于对语言模块性问题的理解不同而引发了争论。[4] 但是，在文献中存在一些共识，即认为模块是以资讯封装的方式处理特定表征（ 领域特定性 ）（Bryson和Stein，2001） [5] [6] 。 [7] 应当对“解剖模块性”和“功能模块性”作出区分，前者认为在大脑中存在一个负责处理相关历程的“区域”，而后者则取消了解剖模块性，认为资讯封装分散在大脑的各个部分中。 [8]
没有单一的解剖模块
编辑现有证据指出，没有一个解剖区域专门用来处理语言。瓦达测试（Wada test）使用异戊巴比妥钠来麻醉一个脑半球 ，结果表明左半球对语言处理至关重要。[9] 然而，神经成像的结果指出，语言处理并非只有单独区域涉及，而是由许多不同区域涉及语言处理中的不同环节，[10] [11] [12]不只是存在于左半球。[13] 此外，个别区域似乎具有许多不同的功能。[14] 因此，在解剖模块内发生语言处理的程度被视为轻微的。 然而，正如许多人所建议的那样，即使语言处理是在整个大脑中进行，语言处理依然可以是模块性处理[15] [16]。亦即，语言处理可以在功能模块中进行。
没有双重分离的习得或发展
编辑一种用于证明模块性的常见方法，是找到一个双重分离。这会分成两组，第一组是语言能力严重受损但认知能力正常的人，第二组则是认知能力严重受损但语言能力完好的人。[17][18][19] 虽然在左半球临侧裂区（perisylvian area）的广泛病变，可能会使人无法产生或感知语言（完全性失语症），[20] 但是没有一种已知个案，在面临严重的非语言性恶化时，语言能够完全完好无损。[21] 因此，基于这一证据，语言处理不能被赋予功能模块的地位。
然而，来自发展研究（Development studies）用来支持语言模块的证据也被提出（最着名的是史迪芬·平克[22]），即所谓“特定型语言障碍和威廉氏症候群之间的分离现象（dissociation）”，前者是语言混乱，而其他心智能力则不受影响，[23] 后者则是存在严重的心智缺陷，语言能力却幸免于难[24]。更近期和实证性强的研究表明，这些主张可能不正确，因此大大削弱了对分离现象的支持。 举例来说，布洛克[25]还有Mervis和Beccera的回顾工作[26]证明，威廉氏症候群患者的语言能力并不比失去语言能力的患者的预测表现还要好。 另外，关于特定型语言障碍究竟是一种语言障碍，还是病因来自更普遍的认知问题（如语音），有着相当多的争论。[27][28][29][30] 因此，目前还没有找到证明模块性所需的证据，即保持完好的语言能力却有严重的智力退化。因此，发展资料的证据几乎无法证明语言处理发生在模块中。
因此，双重分离的证据未能佐证模块性，虽然缺乏分离并不能证明模块是错的，但是该结果并无法从逻辑上推论出模块性。
缺乏资讯的封装
编辑如果语言是一个模块，它的确会是资讯封装的。 然而，有证据表明事实并非如此。例如，在麦格克效应（McGurk effect）中，看着说某个音素的唇型，同时却播放另一个音素，就产生了混合音素的知觉。[31][32] 另外，坦恩豪斯（Tanenhaus）、斯皮维-诺尔顿（Spivey-Knowlton）、埃伯哈德（Eberhard）和塞迪维（Sedivy）（1995年）证明，视觉资讯会介入句法处理。此外，假定的语言模块应该只会处理与语言有关的资讯（即领域特定性）， 然而，有证据表明，用于辅助语言的区域也介入了运动控制[33]]和非语言的声音理解。[34]虽然在低于当前成像技术的分辨率下，仍可能会发生分离现象的处理过程，但是将所有证据综合起来后，资讯封装的根据就变得很薄弱。
替代理论
编辑另一种观点认为，语言发生在一个更普遍的认知系统中。[35] 对此的反驳则是，人类语言似乎有着“特殊性”[36] 。这通常有着证据支持，例如所有教导动物人类语言的尝试都失败了（Hauser et al. 2003年），以及语言可以被有选择地破坏（单一的分离现象）[37] 。这些证据表明，语言处理可能需要专用的计算。 理论家们没有假设“纯粹的”模块性，而是选择了一个较弱的版本，即在功能特定的神经电路和计算中，实现领域特定性。例如，按杰肯道夫（Jackendoff）和平克的话来说“我们不该以一个整体，而是以成分结合的方式来研究语言，其中一些成分是语言特有的，另一些成分则是根植于更普遍的能力”[38]
相关辩论仍在持续进行。
参见
编辑参考文献
编辑- ^ Schwarz-Friesel, Monika. Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. Dritte, aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Francke. 2008. ISBN 3825216365.
- ^ Goel, Vinod. Anatomy of deductive reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007, 11 (10): 435–441 [2020-07-06]. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.003.
- ^ Kiely, Kim. Cognitive function. Michalos, Kim M. (编). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. 2014 [2020-06-15]. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_426. （原始内容存档于2022-06-15）.
- ^ Coltheart, M. (1999). Modularity and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 115–120
- ^ Bryson, J. J. (2002). Language isn’t quite that special （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 25 (6), 679–680
- ^ Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
- ^ Flombaum, J. I., Santos, L. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2002). Neuroecology and psychological modularity （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (3), 106–108
- ^ Calabretta, R., Di Ferdinando, A., Wagner, G. P., & Parisi, D. (2003). What does it take to evolve behaviorally complex organisms? BioSystems, 69, 245–262
- ^ Wada, J., & Rasmussen, T. (1960). Intracarotid injection of Sodium Amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. Experimental and clinical observations. Journal of Neurosurgery, 17, 266–282
- ^ Raichle, M.E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 585–589.
- ^ Martin, R. C. (2003). Language processing: Functional organization and neuroanatomical basis[失效链接]. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 55–90
- ^ Binder, J., & Price, C. (2001). Functional imaging of language. In R. Cabeza and A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of Functional Neuroimaging of Cognition (pp. 187–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- ^ Robertson, D. A., Gernsbacher, M.A., Guidotti, S.J., Robertson, R.R., Irwin, W., Mock, B.J., & Campana, E. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Psychological Science, 11, 255–60
- ^ Grodinsky, Y. (2006). The language faculty, Broca’s region, and the mirror system. Cortex, 42 (4), 464–468
- ^ Pinker, S. (1997). How The Mind Works. Harmondsworth: Penguin
- ^ von der Malsburg, C. (1995). Binding in models of perception and brain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 520–52
- ^ Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (2003). What can we infer from double dissociations? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） Cortex, 39, 1–7
- ^ Coltheart, M., & Davies, M. (2003). Inference and explanation in cognitive neuropsychology. Cortex, 39, 188–191
- ^ Moscovitch, M. & Umiltà, C. (1990). Modularity and neuropsychology: implications for the organization of attention and memory in normal and brain-damaged people. In M. F. Schwartz (Ed.), Modular Deficits in Alzheimertype dementia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- ^ Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger
- ^ Levy, Y. (1996). Modularity of language reconsidered. Brain & Language, 55 (2), 240–263
- ^ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language, pp. 37–43. New York: W. Morrow
- ^ van der Lely, H. K. J. (2005). Domain-Specific Cognitive Systems: Insight from Grammatical Specific Language Impairment （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (2), 53–59
- ^ Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1988). Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In D. Bishop and K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 177–189). London: Churchill Livingstone
- ^ Brock, J. (2007). Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 97–127
- ^ Mervis, C. B., & Beccera, A. M. (2007). Language and communicative development in Williams Syndrome[永久失效链接]. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 3–15
- ^ Norbury, C., Bishop, D. V. M., & Briscoe, J. (2001). Production of English finite verb morphology: A Comparison of SLI and mildmoderate hearing impairment （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 165–178
- ^ Leonard, L. 1998, Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
- ^ Bishop, D. V. M. (1994). Grammatical errors in specific language impairment: Competence or performance limitations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 507–550
- ^ Kail, R. (1994). A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 418–421
- ^ McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264 (5588), 746–748
- ^ Carston, R. (1996). The architecture of the mind: modularity and modularization. In D. Green et al. (Eds.), Cognitive Science: An Introduction (pp. 53–83). Cambridge: Blackwell
- ^ Heiser, M., Iacoboni, M., Maeda, F., Marcus, J., & Mazziotta, J.C. (2003). The essential role of Broca's area in imitation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1123–1128
- ^ Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Wilson, S. M., Dronkers, N. F., & Bates, E. (2003). Neural resources for processing language and environmental sounds: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 126 (4), 928–945
- ^ Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986) PDP models and general issues in cognitive science. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press
- ^ Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95, 201–236
- ^ Pulvermuller, F. (2003). The Neuroscience of Language. On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- ^ Jackendoff, R. & Pinker, S. (2005) The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, & Chomsky) Cognition, 97 (2), 211–225, page 223
进一步阅读
编辑- Altmann, G. T. M. (2001). The mechanics of language: Psycholinguistics in review. The British Journal of Psychology, 92, 129–170.
- Bauer, R. M., & Zawacki, T. (2000). Auditory Agnosia and Amusia. In M.J. Farah and T.E. Feinberg (Eds.), Patient-Based Approaches to Cognitive Neuroscience, (pp. 97–106). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Breedin, S. D., & Saffran, E. M. (1999). Sentence processing in the face of semantic loss: A case study （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 547–62.
- Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., & Coslett, H. B. (1999). Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 617–60.
- Colledge, E., Bishop, D., Koeppen-Schomerus, G., Price, T., Happe, F., Eley, T., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2002). The structure of language abilities at 4 years: A twin study. Developmental Psychology, 38, 749–757.
- Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1999). Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Neuron, 24, 427–32.
- Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Garrard, P., Carroll, E., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2004). Dissociating lexico-semantics and lexico-syntax in semantic dementia. Neurocase, 10, 353–362.
- Grafman, J., Passafiume, D., Faglioni, P., & Boller, F. (1982) Calculation disturbances in adults with focal hemispheric damage （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Cortex, 18, 37–50.
- Griffiths T. D., Rees, A., & Green, G. G. R. (1999). Disorders of human complex sound processing. Neurocase, 5, 365–378
- Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how does it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
- Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 131–138.
- Hill, E. L. (2001). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: A review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders / Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, 36 (2), 149–171.
- Kahn, H. J., & Whitaker, H.A. (1991). Acalculia: an historical review of localization. Brain Cognition, 17, 102–15.
- Luzzatti, C., Aggujaro, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2006). Verb-noun double dissociations in aphasia: Theoretical and neuroanatomical foundations （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Cortex, 42 (6):875–83.
- Marcus, G. F. (2006). Cognitive Architecture and Descent with Modification. Cognition, 101, 443–465.
- Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (1987). Against modularity. In J. L.Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
- Martins, I.P. & Farrajota, L. (in press). Proper and common names: A double dissociation. Neuropsychologica.
- Mattys, S. L., Melhorn, J. F., & White, L. (in press). Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation[失效链接]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
- Mattys, S.L., Pleydell-Pearce, C. W., Melhorn, J.F., & Whitecross, S.E. (2005). Detecting silent pauses in speech: A new tool for measuring on-line lexical and semantic processing[失效链接]. Psychological Science, 16, 958–964.
- Miozzo, M., & Gordon, P. (2005). Facts, Events, and Inflection: When Language and Memory Dissociate. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1074–1086.
- Moss, H. E., Abdallah, S., Acres, K., Fletcher, P., Pilgrim, L., & Tyler, L. K. (2003). The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in semantic selection and competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, Suppl. A161.
- Patterson, K. E., & Marcel, A. J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia, and phonological coding of written words （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 307–318.
- Poeppel, D. (2001). Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Cognitive Science, 21 (5), 679–693.
- Raichle, M.E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Nature, 331, 585–589.
- Rosselli, M.; Ardila, A. Calculation deficits in patients with right and left hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia. 1989, 27 (5): 607–617. PMID 2739887. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(89)90107-3.
- Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., Sedivy, J. C., Allopenna, P. D., & Magnuson, J. S. (1996). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. In the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Thomas, M., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 727–788.
- Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (pp. 19–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Trout, J. D. (2001). The biological basis of speech: what to infer from talking to the animals. Psychological Review, 108 (3), 523–549.
- Vouloumanos, A., Kiehl, K., Werker, J.F., & Liddle, P. (2001). Detecting sounds in the auditory stream: Event-related fMRI evidence for differential activation to speech and non-speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 (7), 994–1005.
- Wang, E., Peach, R. K., Xu, Y., Schneck, M., & Manry, C. (2000). Perception of dynamic acoustic patterns by an individual with unilateral verbal auditory agnosia. Brain and Language, 73, 442–455.
- Warren, R. M., & Warren, R. P. (1970). Auditory illusions and confusions. Scientific American, 223, 30–36.
- Warrington, E.K. (1981). Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 295, 411–23.
- Zeki S. (2005). The Ferrier Lecture 1995 behind the seen: The functional specialization of the brain in space and time. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 360, 1145–83.