討論:賓大效應

本條目頁屬於下列維基專題範疇：

（獲評低重要度）

	經濟學主題閱論編本條目頁屬於經濟學專題範疇，該專題旨在改善中文維基百科經濟學類內容。如果您有意參與，請瀏覽專題主頁、參與討論，並完成相應的開放性任務。
未評	根據專題品質評級標準，本條目頁尚未接受評級。
低	根據專題重要度評級標準，本條目已評為低重要度。

Untitled

最新留言：14 年前1則留言1個人參與討論

Penn效應沒有找到官方的翻譯，如果有更好的翻譯名稱請修改。 --loihsin (留言) 2010年10月25日 (一) 02:54 (UTC)回覆

未翻譯內容

最新留言：13 年前1則留言1個人參與討論

未翻譯內容如下。--Flame 歡迎泡茶 2011年4月18日 (一) 00:48 (UTC)回覆

國際發展

The PPP-deviation allows rural Indians to survive on an income below the absolute subsistence level in the rich world. If the money income levels are taken as given, then ceteris paribus, the Penn effect is a very good thing. If it did not apply, millions of the world's poorest people would find that their income was below the survival threshold. However, the effect implies that the money income level disparity as measured by international exchange rates is an illusion, because these exchange rates only apply to traded goods, a small proportion of consumption.

If the genuine income differential (taking local prices into account) is exaggerated by the RER, so the real difference in the standard of living between rich and poor countries is less than GDP per capita figures would suggest. To make a more significant comparison, economists divide a country's average income by its consumer price index.

參見

The Economist's Big Mac Index consistently shows fourfold differentials in the burger's price.
Purchasing Power Parity is the situation in which RERs are 1, a nil Penn effect.

效應在簡單開放經濟模型上的問題

The (naïve form of the) purchasing power parity hypothesis argues that the Balassa-Samuelson effect shouldn't occur. A simple open economy model treating Big Macs as commodity goods implies that international price competition will force Swiss, Russian, and U.S. burger prices to converge in price. The Penn effect denies this convergence; it is clear evidence that the general price level is much higher where (dollar) incomes are high, with no tendency to match the cheaper prices in poorer countries.

同樣的產品要怎麼樣才能在不同的地方以始終不同的價格賣出

The law of one price says that the same item cannot sustain two different sale prices in the same market (since everyone would buy only at the lower price). By reversing this law, we can infer that different countries do not share an efficient common market from the fact that prices for the same good are different.

If a McDonalds patron in Zurich were able to eat in an identical Moscow restaurant at one quarter the price she would do so, and price competition would then equalize the Big Mac price throughout the world. Of course, someone can only eat out locally, so regional price differentials can persist; the Moscow and Zurich branches are not in competition. If the Moscow McDonalds starts giving away burgers the price in Zurich will be unaffected, since one is unlikely to dine in Moscow if starting the evening in Zurich.

外部連結已修改

最新留言：7 年前1則留言1個人參與討論

各位維基人：

我剛剛修改了賓大效應中的2個外部連結，請大家仔細檢查我的編輯。如果您有疑問，或者需要讓機器人忽略某個鏈接甚至整個頁面，請訪問這個簡單的FAQ獲取更多信息。我進行了以下修改：

有關機器人修正錯誤的詳情請參閱FAQ。

祝編安。—InternetArchiveBot (報告軟件缺陷) 2017年9月19日 (二) 20:59 (UTC)回覆

新增話題