歷史性八文件

《歷史性八文件》（英語：Historic Eight Documents）是印度毛派革命家查魯·馬宗達在1966年前後撰寫的八篇文章，其中概述了印度納薩爾派運動依據的思想原則。^[1]^[2]文章提出，印度主流共產主義政黨已接受修正主義，並同意在印度憲法框架內活動，要用人民戰爭推翻印度政府。^[3]

組成

1965年1月28日（文件一）：《當前形勢下我們的任務》
1965年（文件二）：《通過反對修正主義來實現人民民主革命》
1965年4月9日（文件三）：《印度自發革命爆發的根源是什麼？》
1965年（文件四）：《進行反對現代修正主義的鬥爭》
1965年（文件五）：《1965年預示的可能是什麼？》
1966年12月8日（文件六）：《今日的主要任務是通過不妥協地鬥爭修正主義來建立真革命黨的鬥爭》
1966年（文件七）：《通過反對修正主義來建立武裝游擊鬥爭》
1967年4月（文件八）：《用反對修正主義來推進農民鬥爭》

參考

^ History of Naxalism. Hindustan Times. 2007-01-03 [2008-10-26]. （原始內容存檔於2009-01-20）. Snippet:Communist leader Charu Majumdar wrote various articles based on Marx-Lenin-Mao thought during the period, which later came to be known as 'Historic Eight Documents' and formed the basis of Naxalite movement.
^ "The Indian Journal of Political Science, Volume 51", Indian Political Science Association, 1990. Snippet: ... The basic argument of these Historic Eight Documents may be summed up: (1) the Indian revolution must take the path of armed struggle, (2) it should be organized on the pattern of the Chinese revolution and not of the Soviet revolution, and (3) the armed struggle in India should assume the form of Mao Tse-Tung's "people's war" and not of Che Guevara's "Guerrilla War" ...
^ Marius Damas, "Approaching Naxalbari", Radical Impression, 1991, ISBN 81-85459-01-0. Snippet: ... The documents are historic in the sense that a sharp departure from parliamentary cretinism began to take place and revolutionary politics was resolutely put forward combatting revisionism which was well entrenched in the communist movement in India ...

外部連結

印度共產黨（馬列）文庫：歷史性八文（1965-1967）（頁面存檔備份，存於互聯網檔案館）

[hindustantimes2007-1] History of Naxalism. Hindustan Times. 2007-01-03 [2008-10-26]. （原始內容存檔於2009-01-20）. Snippet:Communist leader Charu Majumdar wrote various articles based on Marx-Lenin-Mao thought during the period, which later came to be known as 'Historic Eight Documents' and formed the basis of Naxalite movement.

[ijps1990-2] "The Indian Journal of Political Science, Volume 51", Indian Political Science Association, 1990. Snippet: ... The basic argument of these Historic Eight Documents may be summed up: (1) the Indian revolution must take the path of armed struggle, (2) it should be organized on the pattern of the Chinese revolution and not of the Soviet revolution, and (3) the armed struggle in India should assume the form of Mao Tse-Tung's "people's war" and not of Che Guevara's "Guerrilla War" ...

[damas1991-3] Marius Damas, "Approaching Naxalbari", Radical Impression, 1991, ISBN 81-85459-01-0. Snippet: ... The documents are historic in the sense that a sharp departure from parliamentary cretinism began to take place and revolutionary politics was resolutely put forward combatting revisionism which was well entrenched in the communist movement in India ...

[1]

[2]

[3]