美國民主黨的政治立場

美國民主黨的政治綱領基本以美式自由主義為基礎，這與共和黨的保守主義形成鮮明對比。該黨黨內有較大的中間派（英語：New Democrats）^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]和進步派（英語：Progressivism in the United States）^[5]^[6]，以及相對較小的保守派和社會主義派^[7]。

民主黨的政綱尋求推動社會福利（英語：Social programs in the United States）、工會、消費者保護、工作場所安全監管、機會平等、殘障人士權利（英語：Disability rights movement）、種族平等（英語：Social equity）、防止環境污染立法及刑事司法改革（英語：Criminal justice reform in the United States）等。^[8]^[9]^[10]^[11]^[12] 民主黨傾向於支持墮胎權（英語：Abortion-rights movements）、LGBT平權及為非法移民提供獲取公民身份的管道；同時民主黨人通常同意關於氣候變化的科學觀點並在外交事務採取多邊主義。

經濟議題

平等的就業機會（英語：Equal employment opportunity）、強健的社會安全網（英語：Social safety net）及強大的工會歷來都是民主黨經濟政策的核心。^[8] 該黨支持混合經濟^[13]並普遍贊同累進稅制、更高最低工資（英語：Minimum wage in the United States）、社會安全保險、全民醫保、公共教育和公營住宅^[8]。它還支持基礎設施發展和清潔能源投資以促進經濟發展和就業成長。^[14] 而自1990年代開始，民主黨也會偶爾支持中間派的削減政府規模和減少市場監管的經濟改革。^[15]

財政政策

民主黨更加支持累進稅率，通過確保美國最富裕的人群支付最高的稅率來提供更多的服務和減少經濟不平等。^[16] 他們還支持增加政府支出（英語：Government spending）以提高社會服務開銷，同時減少軍事支出。^[17] 他們反對削減社會服務支出，例如社會安全保險、醫療保險、醫療補助等，他們認為這會損害效率和社會正義。

最低工資

全民醫保

公共教育

環境保護

清潔能源

貿易協定

社會議題

司法議題

外交議題

參考資料

^ Molly Ball. No, Liberals Don't Control the Democratic Party. 大西洋. 2014-02-07 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2019-07-24）（英語）.
^ Kevin Cirilli. Centrist Dems ready strike against Warren wing. 國會山報. 2015-03-02 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-08）（英語）.
^ Nicole Gaudiano. Liberals seek 'ideological shift' in the Democratic Party. 今日美國報. 2016-11-09 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2017-11-07）（英語）.
^ Eric Alterman. Why We're Liberals: A Political Handbook for Post-Bush America. Viking. 2008: 339 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9780670018604 （英語）. Suffice to say that there has not been a huge swing away from the center since the 1970s.
^ N. Scott Arnold. Imposing Values: Liberalism and Regulation 2nd Edition. 牛津大學出版社. 2009: 3. ISBN 9780199705290 （英語）. Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum and is represented by the Democratic Party in the United States
^ Paul Starr. Center-Left Liberalism. David Coates (編). The Oxford Companion to American Politics. 牛津大學出版社. 2012 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9780199764310. （原始內容存檔於2018-08-19）（英語）.
^ Andrew Hanna; Taylor Gee. Could America’s Socialists Become the Tea Party of the Left?. 政客. 2017-10-01 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2022-12-06）（英語）.
^ ^8.0 ^8.1 ^8.2 Larry E. Sullivan. The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE. 2009: 291 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9781412951432 （英語）. This liberalism favors a generous welfare state and a greater measure of social and economic equality. Liberty thus exists when all citizens have access to basic necessities such as education, health care, and economic opportunities.
^ John McGowan. American Liberalism: An Interpretation for Our Time. 北卡羅來納大學出版社. 2007 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9780807831717 （英語）.
^ Paul Starr. War and Liberalism; Why power is not the enemy of freedom.. The New Republic. 2007-03-05 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2020-12-02）（英語）. Liberalism wagers that a state ... can be strong but constrained – strong because constrained. ... Rights to education and other requirements for human development and security aim to advance the opportunity and personal dignity of minorities and to promote a creative and productive society. To guarantee those rights, Democrats support a wider social and economic role for the state, counterbalanced by more robust guarantees of civil liberties and a wider social system of checks and balances anchored in an independent press and pluralistic society.
^ Hugo Helco. Sidney M. Milkis; Jerome M. Mileur , 編. The Great Society and the High Tide of Liberalism. 麻薩諸塞大學出版社. 2005: 58. ISBN 9781558494947 （英語）. In (the 1970s) the American government began telling Americans what they could and could not do with regard to abortions, capital punishment, and bilingual education. The 1970s also brought new and more sweeping national regulations to deal with environmental challenges, consumer protection, workplace safety, gender discrimination, the rights of those with disabilities, and political spending.
^ 2016 Democratic Party Platform. UCSB. The American Presidency Project. 2016-07-21 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-11）（英語）.
^ Jonah D. Levy (編). The State After Statism: New State Activities in the Age of Liberalization. 劍橋: 哈佛大學出版社. 2006: 198. ISBN 9780674022775 （英語）. In the corporate governance area, the center-left repositioned itself to press for reform. The Democratic Party in the United States used the postbubble scandals and the collapse of share prices to attack the Republican Party ... Corporate governance reform fit surprisingly well within the contours of the center-left ideology. The Democratic Party and the SPD have both been committed to the development of the regulatory state as a counterweight to managerial authority, corporate power, and market failure.
^ Jobs and the Economy. 民主黨. [2022-09-22]. （原始內容存檔於2015-03-20）（英語）.
^ Dan Roberts. Wall Street deregulation pushed by Clinton advisers, documents reveal. 衛報. 2014-04-19 [2022-09-22]. （原始內容存檔於2020-01-06）（英語）.
^ How High Should Taxes Be?. About, Inc. 美國國務院. [2022-09-28]. （原始內容存檔於2005-09-20）（英語）.
^ Brian M. Riedl. Budget Resolution Calls for Massive Tax Hikes and Spending Increases. The Heritage Foundation. 2007-05-17 [2022-09-28]. （原始內容存檔於2010-03-12）（英語）.

[1] Molly Ball. No, Liberals Don't Control the Democratic Party. 大西洋. 2014-02-07 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2019-07-24）（英語）.

[2] Kevin Cirilli. Centrist Dems ready strike against Warren wing. 國會山報. 2015-03-02 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-08）（英語）.

[3] Nicole Gaudiano. Liberals seek 'ideological shift' in the Democratic Party. 今日美國報. 2016-11-09 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2017-11-07）（英語）.

[4] Eric Alterman. Why We're Liberals: A Political Handbook for Post-Bush America. Viking. 2008: 339 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9780670018604 （英語）. Suffice to say that there has not been a huge swing away from the center since the 1970s.

[5] N. Scott Arnold. Imposing Values: Liberalism and Regulation 2nd Edition. 牛津大學出版社. 2009: 3. ISBN 9780199705290 （英語）. Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum and is represented by the Democratic Party in the United States

[6] Paul Starr. Center-Left Liberalism. David Coates (編). The Oxford Companion to American Politics. 牛津大學出版社. 2012 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9780199764310. （原始內容存檔於2018-08-19）（英語）.

[7] Andrew Hanna; Taylor Gee. Could America’s Socialists Become the Tea Party of the Left?. 政客. 2017-10-01 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2022-12-06）（英語）.

[Sullivan-8] 8.0 ^8.1 ^8.2 Larry E. Sullivan. The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE. 2009: 291 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9781412951432 （英語）. This liberalism favors a generous welfare state and a greater measure of social and economic equality. Liberty thus exists when all citizens have access to basic necessities such as education, health care, and economic opportunities.

[9] John McGowan. American Liberalism: An Interpretation for Our Time. 北卡羅來納大學出版社. 2007 [2022-09-21]. ISBN 9780807831717 （英語）.

[10] Paul Starr. War and Liberalism; Why power is not the enemy of freedom.. The New Republic. 2007-03-05 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2020-12-02）（英語）. Liberalism wagers that a state ... can be strong but constrained – strong because constrained. ... Rights to education and other requirements for human development and security aim to advance the opportunity and personal dignity of minorities and to promote a creative and productive society. To guarantee those rights, Democrats support a wider social and economic role for the state, counterbalanced by more robust guarantees of civil liberties and a wider social system of checks and balances anchored in an independent press and pluralistic society.

[11] Hugo Helco. Sidney M. Milkis; Jerome M. Mileur , 編. The Great Society and the High Tide of Liberalism. 麻薩諸塞大學出版社. 2005: 58. ISBN 9781558494947 （英語）. In (the 1970s) the American government began telling Americans what they could and could not do with regard to abortions, capital punishment, and bilingual education. The 1970s also brought new and more sweeping national regulations to deal with environmental challenges, consumer protection, workplace safety, gender discrimination, the rights of those with disabilities, and political spending.

[12] 2016 Democratic Party Platform. UCSB. The American Presidency Project. 2016-07-21 [2022-09-21]. （原始內容存檔於2022-11-11）（英語）.

[13] Jonah D. Levy (編). The State After Statism: New State Activities in the Age of Liberalization. 劍橋: 哈佛大學出版社. 2006: 198. ISBN 9780674022775 （英語）. In the corporate governance area, the center-left repositioned itself to press for reform. The Democratic Party in the United States used the postbubble scandals and the collapse of share prices to attack the Republican Party ... Corporate governance reform fit surprisingly well within the contours of the center-left ideology. The Democratic Party and the SPD have both been committed to the development of the regulatory state as a counterweight to managerial authority, corporate power, and market failure.

[14] Jobs and the Economy. 民主黨. [2022-09-22]. （原始內容存檔於2015-03-20）（英語）.

[15] Dan Roberts. Wall Street deregulation pushed by Clinton advisers, documents reveal. 衛報. 2014-04-19 [2022-09-22]. （原始內容存檔於2020-01-06）（英語）.

[16] How High Should Taxes Be?. About, Inc. 美國國務院. [2022-09-28]. （原始內容存檔於2005-09-20）（英語）.

[17] Brian M. Riedl. Budget Resolution Calls for Massive Tax Hikes and Spending Increases. The Heritage Foundation. 2007-05-17 [2022-09-28]. （原始內容存檔於2010-03-12）（英語）.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]