大帐篷

政治術語

大帐篷(英语:big tent)是一个政治术语,指政党政党联盟试图揉合不同的政治观点,同时采纳左派右派的某些主张和理念,从而吸引更多选民的一种现象。

在奉行大帐篷政策的政党或政党联盟内部,有持相异甚至完全相反的不同观点或意识形态的多个政治派别存在,但是这些派别可能在某一问题上具有共识,例如加拿大自由党的政治共识是反对魁北克独立

历史 编辑

美国 编辑

美国,两大政党内部均有不同的政治意识形态存在,例如现今美国共和党虽以保守派为主流,但党内有不少是温和中间派、经济保守派、社会自由派等人士,而经济自由派同时是社会自由派的共和党人在美国东北部仍有一定的影响力。[1]同样地,民主党虽以进步派社会自由派为主,但温和派和保守派在党内仍有一定比例。

委内瑞拉 编辑

委内瑞拉,各反对派政党所奉行的意识形态迥异,如中间偏左的民主行动党、中间偏右正义第一,但他们都反对执政党委内瑞拉统一社会主义党,因此共同组建了政党联盟民主团结圆桌会议

意大利 编辑

于2009年成立的五星运动由于高调反对紧缩政策,获得不少年轻选民和反对紧缩的意大利人支持,在2013年意大利国会选举中获得大幅度的胜利,在得票率上成为众议院第二大党,超越凭选举制度的名单比例代表制取得额外席次的意大利民主党,但该党拒绝与意大利国内任何政党联盟合作,包括回绝民主党要求组建联合政府的建议。

然而五星运动本身并不自认为是属于左派右派属性的政党,但却与多个他国右派民粹主义政党结盟,并与主张退出欧盟英国独立党欧洲议会内结盟及组成党团。但自2019年和民主党组成联合政府后,已转为中间偏左。

其他例子 编辑

参考资料 编辑

  1. ^ David C. King, "The Polarization of American Parties and Mistrust of Government" in Why People Don't Trust Government (eds. Joseph S. Nye, Philip Zelikow, David C. King: Harvard University Press, 1997).
  2. ^ Maria Maguire. Ireland. Peter Flora (编). Growth to Limits: Germany, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy. Walter de Gruyter. 1986: 333 [2017-09-05]. ISBN 978-3-11-011131-6. (原始内容存档于2017-03-04). 
  3. ^ Eoin O'Malley. Contemporary Ireland. Palgrave Macmillan. 2011: 13 [2017-09-05]. ISBN 978-0-230-34382-5. (原始内容存档于2017-03-04). 
  4. ^ David Torrance, "Scotland's Progressive Dilemma," The Political Quarterly, 88 (2017): 52–59. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12319
  5. ^ Severin Carrell, "Alex Salmond's big tent bulges as Tommy Sheridan lends voteless support," The Guardian, 25 April 2011. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2011/apr/25/alex-salmond-tommy-sheridan-election页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆
  6. ^ 6.0 6.1 Marco Lisi; André Freire. The selection of political party leaders in Portugal. Jean-Benoit Pilet; William Cross (编). The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. Routledge. 2014: 124. ISBN 978-1-317-92945-1. 
  7. ^ Tom Gallagher; Allan M. Williams. Southern European socialism in the 1990s. Tom Gallagher; Allan M. Williams (编). Southern European Socialism: Parties, Elections, and the Challenge of Government. Manchester University Press. 1989: 271– [2017-09-05]. ISBN 978-0-7190-2500-6. (原始内容存档于2017-09-05). . Page 271.
  8. ^ Junts pel Sí (Together for Yes): "We are all in, we’ve reached the end of the line". Ara. 2015-07-21 [2017-09-05]. (原始内容存档于2017-08-16). 
  9. ^ Législatives : "Le parti d’Emmanuel Macron a un caractère attrape-tout". Les Inrocks. [2019-12-17]. (原始内容存档于2020-06-16). 
  10. ^ 10.0 10.1 Isabelle Hertner; James Sloam. The Europeanisation of the German Party System. Erol Külahci (编). Europeanisation and Party Politics: How the EU affects Domestic Actors, Patterns and Systems. ECPR Press. 2014: 35. ISBN 978-1-907301-84-1. 
  11. ^ 11.0 11.1 Sarah Elise Wiliarty. The CDU and the Politics of Gender in Germany: Bringing Women to the Party. Cambridge University Press. 2010-08-16: 218–221 [2017-09-05]. ISBN 978-1-139-49116-7. (原始内容存档于2019-03-23). 
  12. ^ Hroník, Jiří. Známe tajemství velkého úspěchu Andreje Babiše. Parlamentní listy. [2016-02-19]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-12). 
  13. ^ Mlejnek, Josef. Marketing jako kingmaker aneb Kam směřují české politické strany?. Revue Politika. [2016-02-19]. (原始内容存档于2019-08-13). 
  14. ^ James L. Newell; James Newell. The Politics of Italy: Governance in a Normal Country. Cambridge University Press. 2010-01-28: 27. ISBN 978-0-521-84070-5. 
  15. ^ Sventlana S. Bodrunova; Anna A. Litvinenko. New media and political protest: the formation of a public counter-sphere in Russia, 2008–2012. Andrey Makarychev; Andre Mommen (编). Russia’s Changing Economic and Political Regimes: The Putin Years and Afterwards. Routledge. 2013: 35. ISBN 978-1-135-00695-2. 
  16. ^ Ditrych, Ondrej. The Georgian succession (PDF). European Union Institute for Security Studies. July 2013: 4 [2018-04-10]. (原始内容 (PDF)存档于2016-02-22). ...GD as a catch-all movement... 
  17. ^ Mohammadighalehtaki, Ariabarzan. Organisational Change in Political Parties in Iran after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. With Special Reference to the Islamic Republic Party (IRP) and the Islamic Iran Participation Front Party (Mosharekat) (学位论文). 杜伦大学: 176. 2012 [2017-09-05]. (原始内容存档于2016-03-04). 
  18. ^ O'Kane, David; Hepner, Tricia, Biopolitics, Militarism, and Development: Eritrea in the Twenty-First Century, Berghahn Books: xx, 2011 [2011-01-15], ISBN 9780857453990 
  19. ^ Sigrid Baringhorst; Veronika Kneip; Johanna Niesyto. Political Campaigning on the Web. transcript Verlag. 2009: 236. ISBN 978-3-8376-1047-5. [失效链接]
  20. ^ William Cross. Party Membership in Quebec. Emilie van Haute; Anika Gauja (编). Party Members and Activists. Routledge. 2015: 50 [2017-09-05]. ISBN 978-1-317-52432-8. (原始内容存档于2017-04-04). 
  21. ^ MORENA (National Regeneration Movement). 2018-01-21 [2018-04-10]. (原始内容存档于2018-05-06). 
  22. ^ Daniel Gallas. Dilma Rousseff and Brazil face up to decisive month. BBC. [2017-08-27]. (原始内容存档于2017-08-27). 
  23. ^ Glenn D. Hook; Julie Gilson; Christopher W. Hughes; Hugo Dobson. Japan's International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security. Routledge. 2001: 58 [2017-09-05]. ISBN 978-1-134-32806-2. (原始内容存档于2019-06-13). 
  24. ^ Lowell Barrington. Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices. Cengage Learning. 2009: 379 [2017-09-05]. ISBN 0-618-49319-0. (原始内容存档于2017-08-22). 
  25. ^ Günther Pallaver. South Tyrol's Consociational Democracy: Between Political Claim and Social Reality. Jens Woelk; Francesco Palermo; Joseph Marko (编). Tolerance Through Law: Self Governance and Group Rights In South Tyrol. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2008: 305, 309. ISBN 978-90-04-16302-7. 
  26. ^ David Lublin. Minority Rules: Electoral Systems, Decentralization, and Ethnoregional Party Success. Oxford University Press. 2014: 229. ISBN 978-0-19-994884-0.