反锡安主义
反锡安主义是反对锡安主义这一政治运动的思想,即反对犹太人在古代以色列地上(又称迦南地、巴勒斯坦地区)建立民族国家以色列这一犹太复国主义运动,和反对现代以色列国的思想。
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/Melbourne_Gaza_protest_Zionist_Criminals%2C_End_the_Palestine_Holocaust.jpg/260px-Melbourne_Gaza_protest_Zionist_Criminals%2C_End_the_Palestine_Holocaust.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Neturei_karta2.jpg/220px-Neturei_karta2.jpg)
反锡安主义分为很多支派:
天主教会与锡安主义
编辑天主教对锡安主义的最初回应抱着强烈的反对态度。 1897年巴塞尔会议(Basel Conference)后不久,半官方的梵蒂冈期刊Civilta Cattolica(由耶稣会会士编辑)对政治性的锡安主义作出圣经神学的判断:“自从拿萨勒人耶稣的预言实现以来已经过了1827年…(在耶路撒冷遭到破坏之后),犹太人流落到各个国家成为奴隶,他们将持续离散(diaspora,galut)直至世界末日。”犹太人不应被允许回到巴勒斯坦、重掌巴勒斯坦的主权:“《圣经》认为,犹太人必须一直生活在其他国家中,继续分散和流亡,这样他们不仅可以通过圣经见证基督…亦可透过自己的存在见证耶稣基督。”
尽管如此,西奥多·赫茨尔于1904年1月底前往罗马,这是在第六届锡安主义大会(1903年8月)之后,在他死亡前的六个月。他寻求获得支持。1月22日,西奥多·赫茨尔首次会见了教廷国务卿拉斐尔枢机主教(Papal Secretary of State, Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val)。根据赫茨尔的私人日记,枢机主教对以色列历史的看法与历代教宗的解释相同,但他也要求犹太人皈依天主教。三天后,赫茨尔遇到了教宗庇护十世,他以相同的方法答复了他提出的犹太人回到以色列的要求,庇护十世说:“我们无法赞成这个运动。我们无法阻止犹太人回到耶路撒冷,我们永远不能批准这个…犹太人没有承认我们的主,所以我们不能承认犹太人。” 1922年,在同一期刊上刊登了维也纳记者的一篇文章,它写道:“反犹主义是绝对必要的,这是对犹太人傲慢态度会产生的自然反应……天主教的反犹主义虽然从不超出道德规范,但却采取所有必要的手段,将基督徒从他们敌人的虐待中解放出来。”这个最初的态度在接下来的50年中不断发生改变,直到1997年为止。1977年,在梵蒂冈研讨会(Vatican symposium)上,教宗若望·保禄二世拒绝了反犹主义的基督教根源,指出:“……对《新约》有关犹太人和他们(在基督之死中所犯)的罪行的错误和不正当解释已经流传得太久了,引起了对犹太人的敌对态度。”[4]
被描述为殖民主义或种族清洗
编辑锡安主义被描述为殖民主义,人们批评锡安主义是为了推进对巴勒斯坦人的土地的不公平没收,认为它涉及到驱逐巴勒斯坦人,对他们造成暴力。将锡安主义看成是殖民主义的主要作者包括Nur Masalha,Gershon Shafir,Michael Prior,Ilan Pappe和Baruch Kimmerling等。[5]
其他人,如梭罗莫和Mitchell Bard,则认为锡安主义不是殖民主义运动,而是作为与巴勒斯坦人竞争的民族主义运动。[6]大卫·霍夫曼(David Hoffman)驳斥了锡安主义是一个“殖民事业”的说法,相反,他将锡安主义定义为肯定性行动的民族计划,并补充说,以色列从古到今都有犹太人的存在。[7]
诺姆·乔姆斯基,约翰·P·奎格利(John P. Quigly),Nur-eldeen Masalha和Cheryl Rubenberg曾批评过锡安主义,认为它不公平地没收巴勒斯坦人的土地和驱逐巴勒斯坦人。[8]
爱德华·萨义德和Michael Prior声称,驱逐巴勒斯坦人的概念是锡安主义早期的组成部分,西奥多·赫茨尔1895年的日记中指出:“我们将不预先通知而努力地驱逐所有的贫困人口——重新占领土地和驱逐穷人的过程必须小心谨慎地进行。”[9] Efraim Karsh批评这个引文扭曲了赫尔兹的目的。[10]他表示“巴勒斯坦的政治宣传”扭曲了此段的用意,并认为赫茨尔在此是指的是自愿重新安置生活在犹太人购买的土地上的擅自占地者;他表示整天日记表示的是:“不用说,我们应该以最努力的手段尊重有信仰的人,保护他们的财产、荣誉和自由。在这个地方上,我们要树立榜样,将整个世界变成一个美好的地方…如果个别地区有这么多不能迁移的人(他们不会出售他们的土地给我们),我们只会让他们留在那里,并在我们所属的地方发展我们的商业。”[11]Derek Penslar说,赫尔兹在写关于征用土地的日记可能考虑的是南美或巴勒斯坦。[12]根据Walter Lacquer的观点,尽管许多锡安主义者提出转让土地,但这从来不是锡安主义的政策,而在1918年,本-古里安则强调“拒绝这个”反感。[13]
Ilan Pappe认为锡安主义会导致种族清洗。[14]这种观点与其他新历史学家(如Benny Morris)的观点有分歧,Benny Morris接受巴勒斯坦人的流亡叙事,但将其置于战争的背景下,就认为这不算是种族清洗。[15]当人们问到Benny Morris如何看待犹太人从卢德和拉姆拉驱逐巴勒斯坦人时,他回答说:“历史的某些情况会证明种族清洗是正当的,我知道这个术语在21世纪的话语中是完全负面的,但是在种族清洗和种族灭绝(摧毁你们的人民)之间做选择,我会选择种族清洗。”[16]
Saleh Abdel Jawad、Nur Masalha、Michael Prior、Ian Lustick和John Rose批评锡安主义,认为它需要对巴勒斯坦人的暴行负责,例如代尔亚辛村大屠杀,易卜拉欣大惨案,以及贝鲁特难民营大屠杀。[17]
1938年,圣雄甘地拒绝了锡安主义,认为在巴勒斯坦建立一个犹太民族国家是宗教行为,因此不得以武力进行,他将其与印度分裂为印度教和穆斯林国家进行比较。他写道:“巴勒斯坦属于阿拉伯人,就像英国属于英国人,或法国属于法国人。将犹太人强加给阿拉伯人是错误的和不人道的…当然,如果将自豪的阿拉伯人赶走,从而部分地或全部地恢复犹太人的民族国家,这样做会危害人类…他们只能以一种对阿拉伯人抱着善意的方式定居在巴勒斯坦。他们应该转变阿拉伯人的心。”[18]甘地后来在1946年告诉美国记者Louis Fischer:“犹太人在巴勒斯坦有很强的理由。如果阿拉伯人认为自己拥有巴勒斯坦,那么犹太人则有更强的理由。”[19]
被描述为种族主义者
编辑戴维·本-古里安说:“在犹太国家公民中,将没有基于种族,宗教,性别或阶级的歧视。”[20]同样,泽维·贾鲍京斯基还表示:“少数族群不会变得手无寸铁……民主的目标就是要保障少数族群对国家政策事宜的影响。”[21]
然而,锡安主义的批评者认为这是殖民主义的或种族主义的运动。历史学家Avi Shlaim说,直至今天,锡安主义在整个历史中“充满了对原住民的深刻敌意和蔑视。” Shlaim缓和了这个观点,他指出,锡安主义运动中一直有人批评这种态度。他列举了Ahad Ha'am的例子,Ahad Ha'am在1891年访问巴勒斯坦后发表了一系列文章,批评锡安主义定居者的侵略行为和政治民族中心主义。Ahad Ha'am写道“锡安主义者以敌对和残酷的方式对待阿拉伯人,不公正地侵略他们的边界,无理由地殴打他们,甚至吹嘘这些做法,没有人立即制止这种蔑视和危险的倾向,”他们认为“阿拉伯人唯一懂得的语言是暴力的语言。”[22]一些批评锡安主义的人声称犹太教“选民”的概念是锡安主义种族主义的根源[23],尽管古斯塔沃·派来德尼克认为这是一个与锡安主义无关的宗教观念。 [24]
1973年12月,联合国通过了一系列谴责南非的决议,提到了“葡萄牙殖民主义、种族隔离与锡安主义之间的不道德的联盟”。[25]那时,以色列和南非之间几乎没有合作,[26]虽然两国在1970年代形成密切的关系。[27]在南非种族隔离制度和某些以色列对巴勒斯坦人的政策之间也存在着某种平行,这些政策被视为锡安主义思想中的种族主义体现。[28]
1975年,联合国大会通过了第3379号决议,其中认为“锡安主义是一种种族主义和种族歧视的形式”。根据该决议,“任何种族优越性的原则在科学上都是虚假的,道义上是需要谴责的,在社会上不公正的、危险的。”该决议将巴勒斯坦、津巴布韦和南非被占的领土列为种族主义政权的例子。 3379号决议由苏联率先提出,并得到阿拉伯和非洲的很多国家的支持而得到通过,这些国家此时正指责以色列支持南非的种族隔离政权。[29]美国代表丹尼尔·帕特里克·莫伊尼汉(Daniel Patrick Moynihan)强烈批评这一决议“下流”且“对联合国造成了伤害”。[30]1991年,以色列宣布如果取消这个决议,它只参加1991年的马德里会议,于是这个决议在联合国大会决议46/86中被废除。[31][32]
美国……不承认,不会遵守,永远不会默许这个臭名昭着的决议……“锡安主义是种族主义”是一个谎言。绝对明确的是,它并不是种族主义。 — Daniel Patrick Moynihan, speaking in the UN General Assembly after Resolution 3379 was passed, 1975.[30]
在南非德班举行的2001年反对种族主义世界会议(2001 UN conference on racism)上,阿拉伯国家试图将锡安主义与种族主义联系起来[33],这导致美国和以色列以离场的方式表示抗议。会议的最后文本没有将锡安主义与种族主义联系起来。另一方面,与会议相关的人权论坛将锡安主义与种族主义等同起来,并谴责以色列所谓的“种族主义罪行,包括其种族灭绝和种族清洗行为。”[34]
极端正统派和锡安主义
编辑哈雷迪犹太教(也称极端正统派)中部分派别反对锡安主义。他们将锡安主义看作是一种世俗化运动,他们拒绝将民族主义作为教条,认为犹太教是一个不依赖于国家的宗教。然而,一些哈雷迪犹太教运动(例如自2010年以来的Shas)确实公开地与锡安主义运动联系在一起。
一些哈雷迪拉比不认为以色列是一个奠基于犹太法律上的犹太国家,因为它有一个世俗政府。但他们负责确保犹太人维护宗教的理想,而且,由于大多数以色列公民是犹太人,他们在以色列内追求这个议程。[需要解释]其他人则拒绝犹太国家是可能的,因为他们认为犹太国家完全被犹太教律法所禁止的。在他们看来,犹太国的概念相当矛盾。
两个哈雷迪政党曾在以色列选举中是竞选人。人们有时将它们与民族主义的或锡安主义的观点相联系。它们更喜欢与民族主义的锡安主义政党的联盟,可能是因为这些政党更有兴趣加强以色列国家的犹太性质。塞法迪正统派的沙斯党拒绝与锡安主义运动联系起来;然而,在2010年,它加入了世界锡安主义组织。投票支持它的通常是锡安主义者,而且,国会议员经常追求他人视为锡安主义的议程。沙斯党支持与阿拉伯和巴勒斯坦人在领土上的妥协,但它一般拒绝对犹太圣地的妥协。[需要解释]
以色列团结党代表非哈西迪,或立陶宛的哈雷迪阿什肯纳兹犹太人。以色列团结党始终避免与锡安主义运动联系起来,通常避免投票或讨论与和平有关的问题,因为其成员不在军队中服役。该党的工作是确保以色列和以色列的律法在安息日休息等问题上与犹太律法一致。立陶宛犹太人的拉比领袖,例如拉比埃拉扎尔·沙赫和拉比 Avigdor Miller强烈反对一切形式的锡安主义,不管是宗教的还是世俗化的。但他们允许成员参与以色列的政治生活,包括被动地和积极地参与选举。
在耶路撒冷的许多其他哈西迪集团(最著名的是Satmar Hasidim,以及他们所属的更大的运动Edah HaChareidis,都是强烈的反锡安主义者。所有现代锡安主义政治的最著名的哈西迪反对者之一是匈牙利拉比、塔木德学者Joel Teitelbaum。他认为,现在的以色列国家与犹太教是相反的,因为它是由一些具有反宗教性质的人所建立的,并且显然违反了犹太人应该等待犹太弥赛亚的传统观念。
Teitelbau在反对现代锡安主义时提到古典犹太教来源的核心引文;特别是塔木德的一段话,在其中,拉比Yosi b'Rebbi Hanina解释(Kesubos 111a)到上帝在以色列国上施加了“三个誓言”:a)以色列不应该用武力集体返回土地。 b)以色列不应反叛其他国家;和c)其它国家不应过度地压制以色列。根据Teitelbaum的说法,就以色列随后与阿拉伯诸国的战争而言,已经违反了第二个誓言。
在Edah HaChareidis中的反对团体有Dushinsky,Toldos Aharon,Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok,Spinka等人。他们在耶路撒冷以至于全世界的人口都是成千上万的。
“圣城守卫”,一个正统哈雷迪犹太教的宗教运动,认为以色列是一个“种族主义政权”。[36]这个宗教运动被大多数主流犹太人视为“犹太教最边缘”的邪教; [37]犹太虚拟图书馆(Jewish Virtual Library)认为他们有5,000人左右,[38]但反诽谤联盟估计,少于100个社群成员实际上参与到反以色列的激进主义中。[37]这一运动将锡安主义等同于纳粹主义,[39]认为锡安主义意识形态违背了摩西五经的教义,[40]同时也指责锡安主义增强了反犹主义。“圣城守卫”的成员在极端言论和支持著名反犹主义和伊斯兰极端分子上有着很长的历史。[37]
在传统上,立陶宛犹太人哈巴德运动没有被确定为锡安主义者,但自20世纪末以来采取了锡安主义议程,反对以色列在领土上的任何妥协。
反锡安主义或反犹主义
编辑一些反锡安主义者的批评者认为,反锡安主义很难与反犹主义区分开来[41],并认为,对以色列的批评可以作为反犹的借口。[42] 马丁·路德·金曾被指在公开信上 (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)谴责反锡安主义为反犹太主义。[43]其它学者认为,对锡安主义的某些形式的反对构成了反犹主义。[44]很多学者认为,反锡安主义和反对以色列政策在最极端的情况下往往与反犹主义重叠。[44]在阿拉伯世界中,“犹太人”和“锡安主义者”一词通常可以互换使用。为了避免被指责为反犹主义,巴勒斯坦解放组织历来一直避免使用“犹太人”一词,而使用“锡安主义者”,尽管巴勒斯坦解放组织官员有时会口误。
有些反犹主义者指出,锡安主义过去曾经是(或现在也是)犹太人控制世界的阴谋的一部分。[45] 这些指控因《锡安长老议定书》得到全球的关注。这个虚构的议案是对此阴谋的犹太领导的虚构性的会议记录。对他们欺诈根源的分析和证明可追溯到1921年。[46]1920年的德文版将其改名为《锡安主义者议定书》(The Zionist Protocols)。[47]这个议案被纳粹宣传广泛使用,并且仍旧在阿拉伯世界广泛发行。1988年的《哈马斯纲领》(Hamas charter)提到这个文本。[48]
反锡安主义者中确实存在一些使用以前与反犹主义相关的指责、诽谤、图像和战术的例子。 1973年10月21日,当时的苏联驻联合国大使雅科夫·马利克宣称:“锡安主义者强调希伯来人是上帝选民的理论,这是荒谬的思想。”同样,在圣彼得堡的前“宗教和无神论博物馆”关于锡安主义和以色列的展览也将下列的这些东西作为苏联锡安主义的材料:犹太人祈祷经文护符匣和逾越节哈加达[49],尽管这些都是犹太人使用了数千年的宗教用品。[50]
另一方面,反锡安主义作家,如乔姆斯基、Norman Finkelstein、Michael Marder和塔里克·阿里则认为,将反锡安主义描述为反犹主义是不准确的,它有时掩盖对以色列政策和行动的合法批评,它有时被用作政治手段,以扼杀对以色列的合理批评。[51]
2019年,美国国务卿蓬佩奥表示反锡安主义就是反犹太主义。[52]2023年12月,美国众议院批准一项决议,该决议认定反锡安主义就是反犹太主义。[53]
参考资料
编辑- ^ Halpern, Gilad, host. "Left Handed Compliments ...." (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) The Tel Aviv Review, TLV1 Podcasts. 17 November 2017. See discussion beginning at 22:33.
- ^ Brian Klug, No, anti-Zionism is not anti-semitism (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) The Guardian 3 December 2003
- ^ Naomi Zeveloff, "How Steve Bannon and Breitbart News Can Be Pro-Israel — and Anti-Semitic at the Same Time" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), The Forward
- ^ Rev. Thomas F. Stransky, Paulist. "A Catholic Views — Zionism and the State of Israel" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). The Holy land.
- ^ Shafir, Gershon, Being Israeli: The Dynamics of Multiple Citizenship, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp 37–38 Bareli, Avi, "Forgetting Europe: Perspectives on the Debate about Zionism and Colonialism", in Israeli Historical Revisionism: From Left to Right, Psychology Press, 2003, pp 99–116 Pappé Ilan, A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp 72–121 Prior, Michael, The Bible and colonialism: a moral critique, Continuum International Publishing Group, 1997, pp 106–215 Shafir, Gershon, "Zionism and Colonialism", in The Israel / Palestinian Question, by Ilan Pappe, Psychology Press, 1999, pp 72–85 Lustick, Ian, For the Land and the Lord … Zuriek, Elia, The Palestinians in Israel: A Study in Internal Colonialism, Routledge & K. Paul, 1979 Penslar, Derek J., "Zionism, Colonialism and Postcolonialism", in Israeli Historical Revisionism: From Left to Right, Psychology Press, 2003, pp 85–98 Pappe, Ilan, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld, 2007
- ^ Post-Zionism doesn't exist (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). Shlomo Avineri. Zionism Is Not Colonialism (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). By Mitchell Bard.
- ^ Hoffman, David. "Zionism is not a 'settler-colonial undertaking'." The Mail & Guardian, South Africa. June 28, 2005
- ^ Salaita, Steven George (2006). The Holy Land in Transit: Colonialism and the Quest for Canaan. Syracuse University Press. p. 54. ISBN 0-8156-3109-X. Hirst, David (2003). The Gun and the Olive Branch: The Roots of Violence in the Middle East. Nation Books. pp. 418–419. ISBN 1-56025-483-1. Chomsky, Noam (1996). World Orders, Old and New. Columbia University Press. p. 264. ISBN 0-231-10157-0. "FrontPage magazine interview with Christopher Hitchens". December 11, 2003. Masalha, Nur (2000). Imperial Israel and the Palestinians: The Politics of Expansion. Pluto Press. p. 93. ISBN 0-7453-1615-8. "Essay by James M. Martin from "Atheist Nexus"". Quigley, John B. (1990). Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice. Duke University Press. pp. 176–177. ISBN 0-8223-1023-6. Chomsky, Noam (1999). Fateful Triangle: the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (2nd Ed, revised). South End Press. pp. 153–154. ISBN 0-89608-601-1. Saleh Abdel Jawad (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in Israel and the Palestinian Refugees, Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, p. 78. Yishai, Yael (1987). Land or Peace: Whither Israel?. Hoover Press. pp. 112–125. ISBN 0-8179-8521-2. Rubenberg, Cheryl (2003). The Palestinians: In Search of a Just Peace. Lynne Rienner Publishers. p. 162. ISBN 1-58826-225-1. Geaves, Ron (2004). Islam and the West Post 9/11. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 31. ISBN 0-7546-5005-7. Kassim, Anis F. (2000). The Palestine Yearbook of International Law, 1998–1999, Volume 10. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 9. ISBN 90-411-1304-5. Raphael Israeli, Palestinians Between Israel and Jordan, Prager, 1991, pages 158–159, 171, 182.
- ^ Said, Edward, The Edward Said Reader, Random House, Inc., 2000, pp 128–129 Prior, Michael P. Zionism and the State of Israel: A Moral Inquiry, Psychology Press, 1999, pp 191–192 Penslar, Derek, Israel in History: The Jewish State in Comparative Perspective, Taylor & Francis, 2007, p 56.
- ^ "Benny Morris's Reign of Error, Revisited The Post-Zionist Critique" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). Middle East Forum. Spring 2005. Retrieved2014-08-13.
- ^ Patai, Raphael (editor) (1960). The Complete Diaries of Theodor Herzl, translation, June 1895 entry. Herzl Press and Thomas Yoseloff. p. 88. Alexander, Edward; Bogdanor, Paul (2006). The Jewish Divide Over Israel. Transaction. pp. 251–2.
- ^ * Penslar, Derek, Israel in History: The Jewish State in Comparative Perspective, Taylor & Francis, 2007, p 56.
- ^ Laquer, Walter (1972). A History of Zionism. Random House. pp. 231–232.
- ^ Pappe, Ilan, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld, 2007
- ^ Rane, Halim. Islam and Contemporary Civilisation. Academic Monographs, 2010. ISBN 978-0-522-85728-3. p. 198
- ^ Shavit, Ari. "Survival of the Fittest (an interview with Historian Benny Morris)" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). Haaretz, Magazine Section, 9 January 2004. Retrieved 2 February 2015.
- ^ Khallidi, Walid, "Plan Dalet: The Zionist Master Plan for the Conquest of Palestine", in Middle East Forum, no. 22, Nov 1961, p 27. Weisburd, David, Jewish Settler Violence, Penn State Press, 1985, pp 20–52 Lustick, Ian, "Israel's Dangerous Fundamentalists", Foreign Policy, 68 (Fall 1987), pp 118–139 Tessler, Mark, "Religion and Politics in the Jewish State of Israel", in Religious Resurgence and Politics in the Contemporary World, (Emile Sahliyeh, Ed)., SUNY Press, 1990, pp 263–296. Saleh Abdel Jawad (2007) "Zionist Massacres: the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in the 1948 War" in Israel and the Palestinian refugees, Eyal Benvenistî, Chaim Gans, Sari Hanafi (Eds.), Springer, p. 78: ".. the Zionist movement, which claims to be secular, found it necessary to embrace the idea of 'the promised land' of Old Testament prophecy, to justify the confiscation of land and the expulsion of the Palestinians. For example, the speeches and letter of Chaim Weizman, the secular Zionist leader, are filled with references to the biblical origins of the Jewish claim to Palestine, which he often mixes liberally with more pragmatic and nationalistic claims. By the use of this premise, embraced in 1937, Zionists alleged that the Palestinians were usurpers in the Promised Land, and therefore their expulsion and death was justified. The Jewish-American writer Dan Kurzman, in his book Genesis 1948 … describes the view of one of the Deir Yassin's killers: 'The Sternists followed the instructions of the Bible more rigidly than others. They honored the passage (Exodus 22:2): 'If a thief be found …' This meant, of course, that killing a thief was not really murder. And were not the enemies of Zionism thieves, who wanted to steal from the Jews what God had granted them?'" Ehrlich, Carl. S., (1999) "Joshua, Judaism, and Genocide", inJewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century, Judit Targarona Borrás, Ángel Sáenz-Badillos (Eds). 1999, Brill. p 117–124. Hirst, David, The Gun and the Olive Branch: The Roots of Violence in the Middle East. 1984, p 139. Lorch, Netanel, The Edge of the Sword: Israel's War of Independence, 1947–1949, Putnam, 1961, p 87 Pappe, Ilan, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld, 2007, p 88
- ^ William R. Slomanson. 'Fundamental Perspectives on International Law. p. 50
- ^ India's Israel Policy. [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2017-11-26).
- ^ Karsh, Efraim (1997). Fabricating Israeli History. Frank Cass. p. 55.
- ^ Sarig, Mordechai (1999). The Social and Political Philosophy of Ze'ev Jabotinsky. Valletine Mitchell. p. 50.
- ^ shlaim, Avi (9 June 1994). "It can be done" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). London Review of Books. 16 (11): 26–27. Retrieved 2012-10-16.
- ^ Korey, William, Russian antisemitism, Pamyat, and the demonology of Zionism, Psychology Press, 1995, pp 33–34 Beker, Avi, Chosen: the history of an idea, the anatomy of an obsession, Macmillan, 2008, pp 139 Shimoni, Gideon, Community and conscience: the Jews in apartheid South Africa, UPNE, 2003, p 167
- ^ ".. This identity is often explicitly worded by its spokespersons. Thus, Yakov Malik, the Soviet ambassador to the UN, declared in 1973: “The Zionists have come forward with the theory of the Chosen People, an absurd ideology.” (As it is well known, the biblical concept of “Chosen People” is part of Judaism; Zionism has nothing to do with it). "
- ^ Resolution 3151 G (XXVIII) of December 14, 1973 by the UN General Assembly
- ^ Israel and Black Africa: A Rapprochement? Ethan A. Nadelmann. Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Jun., 1981), pp. 183–219
- ^ Brothers in arms — Israel's secret pact with Pretoria (The Guardian, February 7, 2006). [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2008-07-25).
- ^ UN envoy hits Israel 'apartheid' (BBC, Feb. 23, 2007) (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆); It's time to rethink Zionism (The Guardian, Feb. 17, 2009) (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆);Zionism as a Racist Ideology, by Kathleen and Bill Christinson (Counterpunch, November 8 / 9, 2003) (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) June 16, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ UN General Assembly Resolution 3379, Racial Discrimination (Council on Foreign Relations, November 10, 1975). [2017年7月18日]. (原始内容存档于2012年1月30日).
- ^ 30.0 30.1 Troy, Gil (2012). Moynihan's Moment: America's Fight Against Zionism as Racism (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 368.ISBN 9780196360331.
- ^ Frum, David (2000). How We Got Here: The '70s. New York, New York: Basic Books. p. 320. ISBN 0-465-04195-7.
- ^ 260 General Assembly Resolution 46-86- Revocation of Resolution 3379- December 16, 1991 — and statement by President Herzog Dec 16, 1991, VOLUME 11–12: 1988–1992. [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2011-06-03).
- ^ Anger over Zionism debate (BBC, Sept. 4, 2001). [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2018-11-07).
- ^ US abandons racism summit(BBC, Sept. 3, 2001) (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)
- ^ Israeli Ambassador Chaim Herzog's Response To Zionism Is Racism Resolution. November 10, 1975. (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) "You dare talk of racism when I can point with pride to the Arab ministers who have served in my government; to the Arab deputy speaker of my Parliament; to Arab officers and men serving of their own volition in our border and police defense forces, frequently commanding Jewish troops; to the hundreds of thousands of Arabs from all over the Middle East crowding the cities of Israel every year; to the thousands of Arabs from all over the Middle East coming for medical treatment to Israel; to the peaceful coexistence which has developed; to the fact that Arabic is an official language in Israel on a par with Hebrew; to the fact that it is as natural for an Arab to serve in public office in Israel as it is incongruous to think of a Jew serving in any public office in an Arab country, indeed being admitted to many of them. Is that racism? It is not! That, Mr. President, is Zionism."
- ^ "We oppose the Zionists and their 'state' (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) May 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. vigorously and we continue our prayers for the dismantlement of the Zionist 'state' and peace to the world." Rabbi E Weissfish, NETUREI KARTA, Representatives of Orthodox Jewry, US, London, Palestine and worldwide.
- ^ 37.0 37.1 37.2 Neturei Karta: What is it?. [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2012-10-29).
- ^ Neturei Karta. [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2017-01-23).
- ^ THE GREAT GULF BETWEEN ZIONISM AND JUDAISM" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), Paper delivered by G. J. Neuberger, a member of Neturei Karta, at the Tripoli Conference on Zionism and Racism.
- ^ What is Zionism?" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) November 14, 2010, at theWayback Machine. Jews against Zionism.
- ^ Laquer, Walter (2003). A History of Zionism. Random House. p. XXiii.; Ottolenghi, Emanuele (2003-11-29). "Anti-Zionism is anti-semitism". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2003-11-29.; "Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism". Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Fall 2004. Retrieved 2012-11-17.; Anti-semitism in Germany: the post-Nazi epoch since 1945 By Werner Bergmann, Rainer Erb, page 182, "Continuity and Change: Extreme Right Perceptions of Zionism" by Roni Stauber in Anti-semitism worldwide 1999/2000 Tel Aviv University;Marcus, Kenneth L. (2007), "Anti-Zionism as Racism: Campus Anti-Semitism and the Civil Rights Act of 1964", William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 15 (3): 837–891
- ^ Temko, Ned (October 17, 2006). "Critics of Israel 'fuelling hatred of British Jews'". The Guardian. London; "H-Antisemitism" (PDF). H-Net. Retrieved 2016-01-22.
- ^ Dr. King (January 20, 2003). "Anti-Zionism Is Anti-Semitism" Archive.is的存档,存档日期2014-06-16.FrontPage Magazine. Retrieved July 12, 2014.
- ^ 44.0 44.1 Anti-semitism in Germany: the post-Nazi epoch since 1945 By Werner Bergmann, Rainer Erb, page 182, "Continuity and Change: Extreme Right Perceptions of Zionism" by Roni Stauber in Anti-semitism worldwide 1999/2000 Tel Aviv University
- ^ Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide, Serif 2001 chapter 3
- ^ A Hoax of Hate. [2017-07-18]. (原始内容存档于2016-12-13).
- ^ Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide, Serif 2001 page 75-76
- ^ Hamas charter, article 32: "The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" ..."
- ^ Korey, W., "Updating the Protocols," Midstream, May 1970, p. 17.
- ^ Prager, D; Telushkin, J. Why the Jews?: The Reason for Antisemitism. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1983. page 169-175.
- ^ Professor Noam Chomsky argues: "There have long been efforts to identify anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism in an effort to exploit anti-racist sentiment for political ends; "one of the chief tasks of any dialogue with the Gentile world is to prove that the distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism is not a distinction at all," Israeli diplomat Abba Eban argued, in a typical expression of this intellectually and morally disreputable position (Eban, Congress Bi-Weekly, March 30, 1973). But that no longer suffices. It is now necessary to identify criticism of Israeli policies as anti-Semitism — or in the case of Jews, as "self-hatred," so that all possible cases are covered." — Chomsky, 1989 "Necessary Illusions". Philosopher Michael Marder argues: "To deconstruct Zionism is ... to demand justice for its victims - not only for the Palestinians, who are suffering from it, but also for the anti-Zionist Jews, "erased" from the officially consecrated account of Zionist history. By deconstructing its ideology, we shed light on the context it strives to repress and on the violence it legitimises with a mix of theological or metaphysical reasoning and affective appeals to historical guilt for the undeniably horrific persecution of Jewish people in Europe and elsewhere."[3][4] (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) American political scientist Norman Finkelstein argues that anti-Zionism and often just criticism of Israeli policies have been conflated with antisemitism, sometimes called new antisemitism for political gain: "Whenever Israel faces a public relations débâcle such as the Intifada or international pressure to resolve the Israel-Palestine conflict, American Jewish organizations orchestrate this extravaganza called the 'new anti-Semitism.' The purpose is several-fold. First, it is to discredit any charges by claiming the person is an anti-Semite. It's to turn Jews into the victims, so that the victims are not the Palestinians any longer. As people like Abraham Foxman of the ADL put it, the Jews are being threatened by a new holocaust. It's a role reversal — the Jews are now the victims, not the Palestinians. So it serves the function of discrediting the people leveling the charge. It's no longer Israel that needs to leave the Occupied Territories; it's the Arabs who need to free themselves of the anti-Semitism. — Tariq Ali, a British-Pakistani historian and political activist, argues that the concept of new antisemitism amounts to an attempt to subvert the language in the interests of the State of Israel. He writes that the campaign against "the supposed new 'anti-semitism'" in modern Europe is a "cynical ploy on the part of the Israeli Government to seal off the Zionist state from any criticism of its regular and consistent brutality against the Palestinians ... Criticism of Israel can not and should not be equated with anti-semitism." He argues that most pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist groups that emerged after the Six-Day War were careful to observe the distinction between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. — Ali, Tariq. "Notes on Anti-Semitism, Zionism and Palestine" (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) December 7, 2010, at the Wayback Machine., Counterpunch, March 4, 2004, first published in il manifesto, February 26, 2004.
- ^ 国务卿蓬佩奥:“反锡安主义就是反犹太主义”[附视频]. ShareAmerica. 2019-03-26 [2023-12-14]. (原始内容存档于2021-04-08).
- ^ Kampeas, Ron. US House okays resolution by Jewish Republicans equating antisemitism to anti-Zionism. The Times of Israel. 2023-12-06 [2023-12-14]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-09).
参见
编辑外部链接
编辑- "Why I Am a Zionist"(页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) feature article by Tom Doran, an ex-anti-Zionist
- The Other Israel: The Radical Case Against Zionism – essays by members of Matzpen
- Stanley Aronowitz, "Setting the Record Straight: Zionism from the Standpoint of its Jewish Critics"(页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), Logos, Issue 3.3 (summer 2004)
- Lawrence Davidson [1], The Present State of Anti-Semitism(页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), Logos, Issue 9.1, (Winter 2010)
- True Torah Jews Against Zionism(页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆)
- Jews Confront Zionism(页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) by Daniel Lange/Levitsky, Monthly Review, June 2009