美國共和黨派系

美國共和黨包括多個政治派系。19世紀,美國共和黨的派系包括:混血派英語Half-Breeds (politics),他們支持進行公務員制度改革;激進派,他們支持廢除美國的奴隸制度,後來又在重建時期倡導給予被解放奴隸平等的公民權死忠派英語Stalwarts (politics),他們支持機械政治英語Political machine。進入20世紀後,共和黨的派系分化為進步派(Progressive Republicans)、雷根派英語Reagan coalition洛克菲勒派。而在21世紀,美國共和黨的派系主要由保守派(在國會以共和黨研究委員會自由核心小組為代表)、溫和派(在國會以共和黨治理集團英語Republican Governance Group問題解決者核心小組英語Problem Solvers Caucus中的共和黨員為代表)和自由派(在國會以共和黨自由核心小組英語Republican Liberty Caucus為代表)組成。在唐納·川普擔任美國總統期間,共和黨又分裂出川普派反川普派英語Never Trump movement

美國共和黨標誌

現有主要派系

編輯
 
第45任及第47任美國總統唐納·川普

巴拉克·歐巴馬擔任美國總統期間,美國共和黨經歷了一場其統治階級(即共和黨建制派)與信奉反建制小政府主義茶黨運動之間的內訌。[1][2][3][4] 2012年,《紐約時報》將共和黨劃分為六個派系:大街選民派(Main Street Voters)、茶黨選民派(Tea Party Voters)、基督教保守派(Christian Conservatives)、自由派(Libertarians)、不滿派(The Disaffected)和瀕危 / 消失派(Endangered / Vanished)。[5] 2014年,皮尤研究中心將傾向於共和黨的選民分為三個派系:堅定保守派(Steadfast Conservatives)、商業保守派(Business Conservatives)和年輕局外派(Young Outsiders)。[6] 2019年,在唐納·川普擔任美國總統期間,538網的小佩利·培根(Perry Bacon Jr.)斷言共和黨將分類成五個派系:川普派、支持川普派、對川普持懷疑態度的保守派、對川普持懷疑態度的溫和派和反川普派。[7]

2021年2月,在唐納·川普敗選給喬·拜登國會山騷亂之後,《華盛頓郵報》的菲利普·邦普(Philip Bump)認為當時的共和黨眾議員已經分裂成川普派(該派系反對第二次彈劾川普和剝奪瑪喬麗·泰勒·格林自由核心小組成員資格及推翻2020年總統選舉結果)、問責核心小組派(該派系支持第二次彈劾川普和 / 或剝奪瑪喬麗·泰勒·格林自由核心小組成員資格)和親民主共和黨人派(該派系既反對第二次彈劾川普和剝奪瑪喬麗·泰勒·格林自由核心小組成員資格但也反對推翻2020年總統選舉結果)。[8] 同一時期,《達拉斯晨報英語The Dallas Morning News》的卡爾·洛布斯多夫(Carl Leubsdorf)也認定共和黨人分為三種類別:從不支持川普派(包括比爾·克里斯托、參議員米特·羅姆尼及州長查利·貝克拉里·霍甘等)、有時支持川普派(包括參議院少數黨領袖密契·麥康諾常駐聯合國代表妮基·黑利等)、始終支持川普派(包括參議員泰德·克魯茲喬什·霍利等)。[9]

2021年3月,根據一份民意調查報告顯示,在川普當選總統後,支持共和黨的選民中分化出五個派系:永絕川普派、後川普派(喜歡川普但不希望他再次參選)、支持川普派(喜歡川普但更認同共和黨而非川普本人)、川普死忠派和共和黨信息戰派(認同陰謀論者)。[10] 同年11月,皮尤研究中心的一份調查顯示有四類美國人群會與共和黨結盟,他們分別是:信仰與旗幟保守派(Faith and Flag Conservatives)、堅定保守派(Committed Conservatives)、民粹右派(Populist Right)和矛盾右派(Ambivalent Right)。[11][12]

截至2023年,國會共和黨議員將眾議院內的共和黨派系稱為「五大家族」。[13][14][15][16] 「五大家族」的概念源自電影《教父》,特指美國黑手黨犯罪家族。[14]美國眾議院內的共和黨「五大家族」指的是代表眾議院右翼的自由核心小組、代表保守派的共和黨研究委員會、代表商人利益的主街核心小組(Main Street Caucus)、代表主流共和黨人的共和黨治理集團英語Republican Governance Group以及跨黨派問題解決者核心小組英語Problem Solvers Caucus中的共和黨議員。需要注意的是,這些派系中的成員相互重疊。[15]

川普派

編輯

川普派(有時被稱為MAGA或「美國優先」運動)[17][18]是截至2024年,共和黨當今的主流派系。[19][20][21][22][23]它被描述為由一系列右翼意識形態組成,包括但不限於右翼民粹主義[24][25][26]民族保守主義[27]新民族主義[28]、和與唐納·川普及其支持者有關的政治運動。[29][30]有一些評論家將他們描述為美國政治上的「極右派」。[31][32][33]

國際關係中,川普主義者支持美國援助以色列,但不支持烏克蘭[34][35],普遍支持俄羅斯[36][37],並支持孤立主義的「美國優先」外交政策議程。[38][39][40][41]他們普遍拒絕黨內和與民主黨的妥協[42][43],並願意驅逐他們認為過於溫和的共和黨官員。[44][45]與其他共和黨人相比,川普派更有可能是移民限制主義者[46],並且反對自由貿易[47]新保守主義[48]環境保護主義[49]

共和黨的川普主義隨著2010年代2020年代全球極右運動的增加而出現[50][51],也被描述為「極右派」的茶黨運動崛起亦推動了川普主義。[52] 2016年總統選舉川普首次當選美國總統後,該黨主要分裂為支持川普和反對川普兩派。[53][54]川普在2020年連任敗選和在2024年再次勝選後,川普派在共和黨中已越來越占主導地位。

保守派

編輯
 
2010年美國各州自認保守派人士占總人口比例:[55]
  49%及以上
  45–48%
  41–44%
  37–40%
  33–36%
  32%及以下

美國現代保守主義誕生於1950年代到1960年代之間,最初的領導人包括共和黨參議員羅伯特·塔虎脫羅素·柯克小威廉·巴克利等人。其核心宗旨包括促進個人自由和自由市場經濟,同時反對工會高稅負政府監管[56]

在經濟政策方面,保守派呼籲大幅度削減政府開支英語Government spending、減少對經濟的監管以及改變或私有化社會保障供給面學派新自由主義的支持者占據著主流地位,但是財政保守主義赤字鷹派英語Deficit hawk貿易保護主義英語Protectionism in the United States等思潮在共和黨內也不乏支持者。1930年之前,共和黨內東北部支持製造業的派系曾堅定要求提高關稅;而在唐納·川普擔任美國總統期間,這一立場在許多保守派圈子內又重新流行起來。[57][58] 保守派通常持社會保守主義立場,他們支持持槍權限制墮胎權;但是這些問題在共和黨內有諸多觀點。[59]

保守派普遍反對平權運動,但支持增大軍費開支和反對控槍。而在學券議題上,共和黨保守派分裂成了兩個陣營。支持者相信「大政府教育是失敗的」;而反對者則擔心政府趁機加強對私立學校和教會學校的控制。部分共和黨保守派因為反環保主義否認氣候變化而否定普遍科學共識[60][61][62][63][64][65] 這使得他們遭致批評;並且他們的這種行為在全球保守派政黨中也獨樹一幟。[65]

在川普當選總統後,保守派思想的長期轉變被描述為傳統保守主義意識形態與右翼民粹主義主題相結合的「新融合主義英語Fusionism」。[66] 這些轉變導致保守派越來越傾向民族保守主義貿易保護主義文化保守主義,支持更現實的外交政策和對新保守主義的否定,同時減少回滾權利計劃的努力以及對傳統制衡的蔑視。[66][67][68]

基督教右派

編輯

自由意志派

編輯
蘭德·保羅
(聯邦參議員)
麥克·李
(聯邦參議員)

新保守派

編輯

溫和派

編輯
約翰·麥肯
(前聯邦參議員)
麗莎·穆考斯基
(聯邦參議員)
蘇珊·柯琳絲
(聯邦參議員)

反川普派

編輯

國會核心小組

編輯
選舉年 共和黨研究委員會 共和黨治理集團英語Republican Governance Group 自由核心小組
2020年
157 / 213
45 / 213
45 / 213
2022年
156 / 222
42 / 222
46 / 222

重要歷史派系

編輯

相關條目

編輯

參考資料

編輯
  1. ^ Republicans and Tea Party Activists in 'Full Scale Civil War'. ABC新聞. 2013-12-13 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-12-06). 
  2. ^ Don Gonyea. GOP Establishment Grapples With A Tea Party That Won't Budge. 全國公共廣播電台. 2013-10-02 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2015-09-14). 
  3. ^ Alan I. Abramowitz. Not Their Cup of Tea: The Republican Establishment versus the Tea Party. Center for Politics. 2013-11-14 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2013-11-16). 
  4. ^ Establishment Vs. Tea Party in Primary Showdowns. CBS新聞. 2010-09-14 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2022-01-17). 
  5. ^ A New Guide to the Republican Herd. 紐約時報. 2012-08-26 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-05-17). 
  6. ^ Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology. 皮尤研究中心. 2014-06-26 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2022-11-04). 
  7. ^ Perry Bacon Jr. The Five Wings Of The Republican Party. FiveThirtyEight. 2019-05-27 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-09-23). 
  8. ^ Philip Bump. The three factions of House Republicans. 華盛頓郵報. 2021-02-05 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2021-02-09). 
  9. ^ Carl P. Leubsdorf. The GOP is divided into 3 warring factions focused on Trump: Never, Sometimes and Always. Dallas News. The Dallas Morning News英語The Dallas Morning News. 2021-02-18 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-01-23). 
  10. ^ Maggie Haberman. A survey of Republicans shows 5 factions have emerged after Trump’s presidency.. 紐約時報. 2021-03-12 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-01-28). 
  11. ^ The Republican coalition - Beyond Red Vs. Blue: The Political Typology. 皮尤研究中心. 2021-11-09 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2024-03-01). 
  12. ^ 分裂的美国:皮尤报告揭示美国公众的九大政治类型. 澎湃新聞. 2021-11-25 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2024-02-16). 
  13. ^ Adrian Blanco; Marianna Sotomayor; Hannah Dormido. Meet ‘the five families’ that wield power in McCarthy’s House majority. 華盛頓郵報. 2023-04-17 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-06-08). 
  14. ^ 14.0 14.1 Emily Wilkins. McCarthy Turns to ‘Five Families’ to Keep Peace Among GOP Rivals. Bloomberg Government. 2023-02-28 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-12-08). 
  15. ^ 15.0 15.1 Luke Broadwater. ‘5 Families’ and Factions Within Factions: Why the House G.O.P. Can’t Unite. 紐約時報. 2023-10-23 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2023-10-27). 
  16. ^ Manu Raju; Melanie Zanona. Kevin McCarthy leans on ‘five families’ as House GOP plots debt-limit tactics. CNN. 2023-02-13 [2024-02-16]. (原始內容存檔於2024-03-09). 
  17. ^ Panel Study of the MAGA Movement. University of Washington. January 6, 2021 [March 24, 2024]. (原始內容存檔於2024-03-24). 
  18. ^ Gabbatt, Adam; Smith, David. 'America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump. the Guardian. August 19, 2023 [March 24, 2024]. 
  19. ^ Ball, Molly. The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism. The Wall Street Journal. January 23, 2024 [February 22, 2024]. (原始內容存檔於January 24, 2024). 
  20. ^ Biebricher, Thomas. The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. October 25, 2023, 65 (2): 233–259. ISSN 2075-4698. doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2  (英語). 
  21. ^ Arhin, Kofi; Stockemer, Daniel; Normandin, Marie-Soleil. THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other?. World Affairs. May 29, 2023, 186 (3). ISSN 1940-1582. doi:10.1177/0043820023117681  (不活躍 November 1, 2024) (英語). In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP). 
  22. ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Sherman, Jake; Bresnahan, John. The end of the Old GOP. Punchbowl News. February 7, 2024 [February 8, 2024]. (原始內容存檔於February 7, 2024) (美國英語). 
  23. ^ Aratani, Lauren. Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push. The Guardian. 26 February 2021 [7 September 2021]. (原始內容存檔於14 August 2021). In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element. 
  24. ^ Campani, Giovanna; Fabelo Concepción, Sunamis; Rodriguez Soler, Angel; Sánchez Savín, Claudia. The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse. Societies. December 2022, 12 (6): 154. ISSN 2075-4698. doi:10.3390/soc12060154  (英語). 
  25. ^ Norris, Pippa. Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics. November 2020, 26 (6): 697–717. ISSN 1354-0688. S2CID 216298689. doi:10.1177/1354068820927686  (英語). 
  26. ^ Cassidy, John. Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party. The New Yorker. February 29, 2016 [July 22, 2016]. (原始內容存檔於March 4, 2016). 
  27. ^ "National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism . The Economist (London). February 15, 2024. (原始內容存檔於February 20, 2024). 
  28. ^ Zhou, Shaoqing. The origins, characteristics and trends of neo-nationalism in the 21st century. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology. December 8, 2022, 6 (1): 18. PMC 9735003 . PMID 36532330. doi:10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4 . On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism. 
  29. ^ Katzenstein, Peter J. Trumpism is US. WZB | Berlin Social Science Center. 20 March 2019 [11 September 2021]. (原始內容存檔於2021-02-15). 
  30. ^ DiSalvo, Daniel. Party Factions and American Politics. National Affairs. Fall 2022 [April 11, 2023]. (原始內容存檔於March 23, 2023).  參數|journal=與模板{{cite magazine}}不匹配(建議改用{{cite journal}}|magazine=) (幫助)
  31. ^ Lowndes, Joseph. Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump. de la Torre, Carlos (編). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London & New York: Routledge. 2019. "Trumpism" section, pp. 197–200 [2024-11-13]. ISBN 978-1315226446. (原始內容存檔於2024-05-01). Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades. 
  32. ^ Bennhold, Katrin. Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right. The New York Times. September 7, 2020 [November 20, 2020]. (原始內容存檔於November 20, 2020). 
  33. ^ Gardner, J.A.; Charles, G.U. Election Law in the American Political System. Aspen Casebook Series. Aspen Publishing. 2023: 31 [2023-12-31]. ISBN 978-1-5438-2683-8. 
  34. ^ Falk, Thomas O. Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine?. Al Jazeera. 2023-11-08 [2023-12-31]. (原始內容存檔於2023-12-31). 
  35. ^ Riccardi, Nicholas. Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia. Associated Press. February 19, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始內容存檔於2024-02-28). 
  36. ^ Lillis, Mike. GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia. The Hill. February 28, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始內容存檔於February 28, 2024). Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia. 
  37. ^ Ball, Molly. How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine. The Wall Street Journal. February 23, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始內容存檔於2024-09-26). 
  38. ^ Lange, Jason. Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed. Reuters. January 17, 2024 [January 17, 2024]. 
  39. ^ Swan, Jonathan; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie. Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power. New York Times. December 9, 2023 [December 10, 2023]. (原始內容存檔於2023-12-10). 
  40. ^ Baker, Peter. Favoring Foes Over Friends, Trump Threatens to Upend International Order . The New York Times. February 11, 2024 [February 21, 2024]. ISSN 1553-8095. (原始內容存檔於2024-02-20) (英語). 
  41. ^ Cohn, Nate. The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters. The New York Times. August 17, 2023 [October 9, 2023]. ISSN 0362-4331. (原始內容存檔於October 12, 2023) (美國英語). 
  42. ^ Collinson, Stephen. McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution. CNN. 2023-10-04 [2023-12-31]. (原始內容存檔於2023-12-31). 
  43. ^ Rocha, Alander. Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them'. AL. 2023-09-07 [2023-12-31]. (原始內容存檔於2024-09-11). 
  44. ^ Macpherson, James. Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party. AP News. 2021-07-24 [2023-12-31]. (原始內容存檔於2024-09-13). 
  45. ^ Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future. The Times Herald. 2023-05-15 [2023-12-31]. (原始內容存檔於2024-09-11). 
  46. ^ Baker, Paula; Critchlow, Donald T. The Oxford Handbook of American Political History. Oxford University Press. 2020: 387 [April 23, 2021]. ISBN 978-0190628697. (原始內容存檔於December 15, 2023) –透過Google Books. Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base. 
  47. ^ Jones, Kent. Populism, Trade, and Trump's Path to Victory. Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System. Oxford University Press. 2021. ISBN 978-0190086350. 
  48. ^ Smith, Jordan Michael; Logis, Rich; Logis, Rich; Shephard, Alex; Shephard, Alex; Kipnis, Laura; Kipnis, Laura; Haas, Lidija; Haas, Lidija. The Neocons Are Losing. Why Aren't We Happy?. The New Republic. October 17, 2022 [May 5, 2023]. ISSN 0028-6583. (原始內容存檔於May 5, 2023). 
  49. ^ Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism. Sustainability. January 2020, 12 (6): 2538. ISSN 2071-1050. doi:10.3390/su12062538  (英語). 
  50. ^ Spiegeleire, Stephan De; Skinner, Clarissa; Sweijs, Tim. The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From, and What It Means for International Security and Defense. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. 2017. ISBN 978-94-92102-59-1. 
  51. ^ Isaac, Jeffrey. Making America Great Again?. Perspectives on Politics (Cambridge University Press). November 2017, 15 (3): 625–631. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000871 . 
  52. ^ Blum, Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike. How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era. British Journal of Political Science (Cambridge University Press). 2024, 54 (1): 88–109 [2023-12-31]. doi:10.1017/S0007123423000224. (原始內容存檔於2024-09-11). 
  53. ^ Johnson, Lauren R.; McCray, Deon; Ragusa, Jordan M. #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election. Research & Politics. January 11, 2018, 5 (1). doi:10.1177/2053168017749383  (英語). 
  54. ^ Swartz, David L. Trump divide among American conservative professors. Theory & Society. 27 May 2022, 52 (5): 739–769. ISSN 1573-7853. PMC 10224651 . PMID 37362148. doi:10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4  (英語). 
  55. ^ Jeffrey M. Jones. Wyoming, Mississippi, Utah Rank as Most Conservative States. 蓋洛普. 2010-08-02 [2024-02-17]. 
  56. ^ Donald T. Critchlow. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the Republican Right Rose to Power in Modern America. University Press of Kansas. 2011 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780700617951. 
  57. ^ Joel D. Aberbach; Gillian Peele (編). Crisis of Conservatism?: The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush. Oxford University Press. 2011: 105. ISBN 9780199831364. 
  58. ^ Bernie Becker. Trump’s 6 populist positions. 政客. 2016-02-13 [2024-02-17]. (原始內容存檔於2019-10-31). 
  59. ^ William Curtis Martin. With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America 2nd Edition. Broadway Books. 1996 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780553067491. 
  60. ^ Philip Shabecoff. Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century 2nd Edition. Island Press. 2000: 125 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9781559635837. 
  61. ^ Samuel P. Hays. A History of Environmental Politics Since 1945. University of Pittsburgh Press. 2000: 119 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780822972242. 
  62. ^ Christopher Sellers. How Republicans came to embrace anti-environmentalism. Vox. 2017-06-07 [2024-02-17]. (原始內容存檔於2017-11-02). 
  63. ^ Riley E. Dunlap; Araon M. McCright. A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2008, 50 (5): 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35. 
  64. ^ Sondre Båtstrand. More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change. Politics & Policy. 2015-08, 43 (4): 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122. 
  65. ^ 65.0 65.1 Jonathan Chait. Why Are Republicans the Only Climate-Science-Denying Party in the World?. 紐約. 2015-09-27 [2024-02-18]. (原始內容存檔於2024-02-11). Of all the major conservative parties in the democratic world, the Republican Party stands alone in its denial of the legitimacy of climate science. Indeed, the Republican Party stands alone in its conviction that no national or international response to climate change is needed. To the extent that the party is divided on the issue, the gap separates candidates who openly dismiss climate science as a hoax, and those who, shying away from the political risks of blatant ignorance, instead couch their stance in the alleged impossibility of international action. 
  66. ^ 66.0 66.1 Edward Ashbee; Alex Waddan. US Republicans and the New Fusionism. 政治季刊英語The Political Quarterly. 2023-12-13. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13341. 
  67. ^ The growing peril of national conservatism. 經濟學人. 2024-02-15 [2024-02-18]. (原始內容存檔於2024-02-15). 
  68. ^ The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation. 經濟學人. 2023-10-26 [2024-02-18]. (原始內容存檔於2024-02-13). 

延伸閱讀

編輯
  • Michael Barone; Richard E. Cohen. The Almanac of American Politics 2010. National Journal Group. 2009. ISBN 9780892341191. 
  • Peter Baker; Susan Glasser. The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. 2022-09-20. ISBN 9780385546546. 
  • John David Dyche. Republican Leader: A Political Biography of Senator Mitch McConnell. ISI Books. 2009. ISBN 9781935191599. 
  • Bruce Frohnen; Jeffrey O. Nelson; Jeremy Beer (編). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. ISI Books. 2006. ISBN 9781932236446. 
  • Nicole Hemmer. Partisans: The Conservative Revolutionaries Who Remade American Politics in the 1990s. Basic Books. 2022-08-30. ISBN 9781541646872. 

外部連結

編輯